Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / The Saudi Arabia-Pakistan-Turkey deal provides the U.S. with an opportunity
Middle East

August 11, 2026

The Saudi Arabia-Pakistan-Turkey deal provides the U.S. with an opportunity

By Daniel DePetris

Every U.S. president over the last 20 years has tried to move the United States out of the Middle East, an area so steeped in bad history and poor policy that one wonders why Washington bothers to be involved in the region at all. Barack Obama campaigned on ending the George W. Bush-era war in Iraq, only to direct a surge of 50,000 U.S. troops into Afghanistan and return the U.S. military to Iraqi soil once the Islamic State started expanding. Joe Biden wanted to focus on U.S. strategic competition with China, only to expend diplomatic capital to a war in Gaza. Donald Trump, meanwhile, insisted dumb wars would no longer be fought under his watch, then chose to embark on the dumbest one of this generation.
The Middle East hasn’t been kind to the United States. The United States hasn’t been kind to the Middle East either. Frankly, both could use a break from each other, which is why last week’s big news from three of the region’s major powers has the potential of being significant.
Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey on Friday announced that they have entered into a mutual defense agreement that sounds quite similar to what the United States has with its NATO allies. Called the “Mecca Joint Defense Agreement,” Riyadh, Islamabad and Ankara declared that an attack on any one of them would henceforth be considered an attack on all of them. The accord is a supplement to a bilateral deal the Saudis and Pakistanis signed with each other in September, which brought a squadron of Pakistani fighter jets and about 8,000 Pakistani troops to the oil-rich kingdom.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Trump responds as Iran says U.S. must meet these six demands if Strait of Hormuz is to reopen

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

August 10, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Why the Trump administration will have to accept a Hormuz toll

By Daniel DePetris

August 10, 2026

Op-edMiddle East

The Mecca pact could be a gift to Trump

By Daniel DePetris

August 8, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The U.S. should cut its losses in Iran

By Christopher McCallion

August 7, 2026

ExplainerUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

A security dilemma made worse: How war with Iran backfired

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 5, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Poor strategy doomed U.S. in the war with Iran

By Daniel Davis

August 5, 2026

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.