Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The hidden logic of Trump’s national security picks
Grand strategy, Americas, Global posture

December 6, 2024

The hidden logic of Trump’s national security picks

By Lyle Goldstein

As President-elect Donald Trump announces his selections for cabinet posts, there is a definite pattern of choosing figures from outside the political mainstream. That is perhaps understandable for a candidate that had many cabinet-level appointments turn abruptly against him in his first term. Some of the selections even seem to constitute brazen challenges to the nation’s governing elite and their institutions. To be sure, these unconventional choices also reflect Trump’s new power deriving from his significant electoral victory—taking all seven battleground states, the popular vote, and both chambers of Congress.

In the national security realm, Trump has promised the American people “peace through strength” and found widespread support for this formula, which may hark back to the golden era of Ronald Reagan. And that’s one consistent theme among all of his foreign policy choices, who come from a variety of backgrounds.

Several of the picks could be considered classic conservative “hawks” in that they have continuously advocated for military escalation against rivals. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL), nominated to the key positions of secretary of state and national security advisor respectively, certainly fit in this category. Nonetheless, we can already see examples of Trump’s unique approach influencing his top advisors. Thus, Waltz actually decried President Joe Biden’s recent decision to allow Ukraine to fire U.S.-made missiles directly into Russian territory: “This is another step up the escalation ladder, and no one knows where this is going.”

Read at The American Conservative

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

In the mediaAmericas

Trump’s feud with Colombian leader threatens U.S. antidrug efforts

Featuring Daniel DePetris

October 28, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Venezuela

Defining a Monroe doctrine for the Caribbean

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 27, 2025

In the mediaVenezuela, Americas, Military analysis

Trump supporters are uneasy about military actions against Venezuela

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Daniel DePetris

October 23, 2025

op-edVenezuela, Americas

Donald Trump brings the war on terrorism to the Caribbean

By Daniel DePetris

October 21, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Americas, Venezuela

Ret. Lt. Col. Daniel Davis shares his thoughts after U.S. strikes ‘narcoterrorist’ submarine

Featuring Daniel Davis

October 18, 2025

Press ReleaseVenezuela, Americas

Pushing regime change in Venezuela is a terrible idea

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 17, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved