Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / The century’s first missile crisis is coming in Asia
Asia, China, Global posture, Military analysis, Nuclear weapons

February 18, 2025

The century’s first missile crisis is coming in Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

Missiles are at the center of global conflicts today. Much of 2024 was spent debating the escalation risks of allowing Ukraine to fire its U.S.-made longer-range missiles at targets inside Russia. In the Middle East, Iran’s high-risk missile attacks on Israeli soil and Israel’s dramatic counterstrike overshadowed—but did not slow—the Yemeni Houthis’ near-daily missile barrages against ships in the Red Sea.

While attention has focused on these lethal standoffs, the most serious missile threat to U.S. national security is unfolding in Asia. There, the Aug. 2, 2019, end of the 1987 U.S.-Soviet Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty—which barred the United States and Soviet Union from fielding any nuclear or nonnuclear ground-launched missiles with ranges between 500 kilometers (310 miles) and 5,500 kilometers (3,418 miles)—has sparked a quiet arms race in a region already on edge. As it embarks on its review of U.S. national defense, the administration of President Donald Trump should pay attention.

Under former President Joe Biden, the U.S. military moved eagerly to seize the opportunities that the INF Treaty’s demise has opened in Asia by developing, testing, and fielding new ground-launched missiles that previously would have been prohibited.

But as new missiles begin arriving in the region, they bring with them many unappreciated risks. Countervailing reactions from adversaries, potentially including nuclear escalation, could leave the United States and its allies less safe even if the longer-range systems would prove useful in a future clash with China.

Read at Foreign Policy

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan

Trump, China and the question of selling arms to Beijing

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

September 29, 2026

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia

The US needs a new Taiwan policy beyond strategic ambiguity

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 25, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Military analysis, Naval power

China’s next carrier could be its longest—what are Beijing’s plans?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

September 25, 2026

Press ReleaseChina, Asia, Diplomacy

Trump-Xi summit should build on ‘constructive strategic stability’ framework

By Lyle Goldstein

September 23, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Taiwan

Trump and Xi Meet With the U.S. in an Unfamiliar Position: Weakened

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

September 22, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan

AI, Trade, Taiwan—Here’s What To Expect From The Trump-Xi DC Summit: Expert

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

September 21, 2026

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualAsia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Asia Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

Defense Priorities Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by American individuals and foundations—no funding comes from the U.S. government or any foreign government. Donations are unlimited and deductible for Federal Income Tax purposes.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.