Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / The Case for the U.S. to Stop Babying Europe on National Security
NATO, Europe and Eurasia

February 29, 2024

The Case for the U.S. to Stop Babying Europe on National Security

By Daniel DePetris

Earlier this month, during a campaign stop in South Carolina, former president and presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump went off on NATO, one of his favorite punching bags. “NATO was busted until I came along,” Trump asserted. “I said, ‘Everybody’s going to pay.’ They said, ‘Well, if we don’t pay, are you still going to protect us?’ I said, ‘Absolutely not.’ They couldn’t believe the answer.” To emphasize the point, Trump stated he would encourage Russia to do “whatever the hell they want” to NATO allies that fall short of the alliance’s defense-spending standards.

The fallout was swift. Julianne Smith, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, called Trump’s remarks “irrational and dangerous.” Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill were aghast, while others downplayed the comments as an attempt by Trump to scare the Europeans into boosting their defense budgets. During the annual Munich Security Conference in Germany this month, Trump’s words, and the prospect of a second Trump presidency, hovered over the transatlantic dignitaries like a bad cold.

Yet in the weeks since, those few sentences in South Carolina have prompted a prevailing sense of urgency in European capitals. Even those who find Trump’s rhetoric boorish and alarming note that he has a point: European defense industries have been left to atrophy since the Soviet Union collapsed more than 30 years ago and are ramping up only now, after two years of war in Ukraine. “It’s high time for Europe to improve its own deterrence capacities and take its security into its own hands,” senior European Parliament lawmaker Valérie Hayer claimed. Dutch defense minister Kajsa Ollongren agreed, stating matter-of-factly that “Europe indeed needs to take more responsibility for its own security.” European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is even basing her reelection campaign on beefing up the institution’s capacity to spend more and “spend better.”

Read at National Review

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

New US-Iran Nuclear Talks as Tensions Rise

Featuring Daniel DePetris

May 22, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine Faces A Growing Risk of Outright Military Collapse If No Deal Struck

By Daniel Davis

May 21, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

The Defining Test: Can Europe’s Rising Right Agree on Ukraine?

By Julian Fisher

May 20, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump should not demand a ceasefire in Putin call

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 19, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s Putin peace deal is doomed

By Daniel DePetris

May 19, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Don’t Blame Trump If He Gives Up on Russia-Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 17, 2025

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved