Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Pivoting north as a middle power in a multipolar Arctic
Grand strategy, China, Europe and Eurasia, Great power competition, Russia, Western Hemisphere

August 22, 2024

Pivoting north as a middle power in a multipolar Arctic

By Andrew Latham

The Arctic, once a peripheral region, has emerged as a pivotal geopolitical stage.

As the world order transitions from unipolarity to a more multipolar landscape, competition for influence and resources in the high north has intensified. For Canada, a nation with extensive Arctic territory and a long-standing commitment to the region, this dynamic presents both challenges and opportunities.

Canada occupies a unique geopolitical position. Unlike many other middle powers, its vast Arctic domain grants it a degree of leverage disproportionate to its overall global influence. This geographic advantage, coupled with its rich natural resources and stable democratic institutions, positions Canada as a key player in shaping the Arctic’s future. However, the challenges are substantial, requiring a sophisticated and nuanced approach to policy-making.

The actions of Russia and China in the Arctic pose significant threats to Canadian, North American, and NATO security interests. Russia, with its extensive Arctic coastline and robust military presence, has been assertive in staking its claim to the region. Moscow’s military modernization, including the deployment of advanced weapon systems, underscores its determination to project power in the Arctic. While overt aggression may be tempered by economic vulnerabilities, Russia’s capacity to disrupt critical infrastructure, such as undersea cables or satellite communications, poses a significant risk.

China, adopting a more economically focused approach, is also increasingly active in the Arctic. Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, while primarily focused on Eurasian connectivity, has implications for the region. China’s growing economic and technological influence, coupled with its strategic ambitions, necessitates close monitoring and a proactive Canadian response.

Read at The Hill Times

Author

Photo of Andrew Latham

Andrew
Latham

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edWestern Hemisphere, Greenland

Donald Trump stirs up trouble in U.S.-Canada relations

By Daniel DePetris

January 27, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Greenland, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s ‘Donroe Doctrine’ flaunts U.S. expansionism and intervention. But will it pay off long-term?

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 25, 2026

ExplainerWestern Hemisphere, Grand strategy

Move on from Washington’s outdated Cuba policy

By Daniel DePetris

January 23, 2026

Western Hemisphere, Diplomacy, Sanctions

Why Washington needs a new Cuba policy

By Daniel DePetris

January 23, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Greenland, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s Board of Peace could turn into a rat race

By Daniel DePetris

January 23, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, China, Greenland, Russia, Western Hemisphere

Russian and Chinese threats to Greenland and the new Arctic sea routes are low

By Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved