Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / New Caledonia unrest is a wake-up call for U.S. strategists
Grand strategy, Asia, China, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

July 1, 2024

New Caledonia unrest is a wake-up call for U.S. strategists

By Lyle Goldstein

The European Parliament elections illustrated that right-wing parties are gaining more traction voters on the other side of the Atlantic, a trend borne out by the first round of France’s snap election on Sunday. This trend could decisively impact the tragic war unfolding in Ukraine. However, the ebb and flow of European politics may also have reverberations in the Asia-Pacific, as well.

French President Emanuel Macron was likely fatigued at the Normandy commemoration because he had just been on the other side of the planet in the South Pacific, attempting to put out the blazing fire in the French territory of New Caledonia.

It was only a few years ago, and with considerable fanfare, that Paris announced its own “Indo-Pacific Strategy.” This is part of a larger trend of NATO governments seeking a new role for the alliance in stabilizing volatile situations in East Asia.

A new “incident” flared on June 11 when a Dutch frigate on its way to Japan encountered Chinese fighter jets operating in an “unsafe” manner. In response, a Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman remonstrated: “We strongly deplore the heinous nature of the Dutch side’s words and deeds…” Westerners may have long forgotten the Sino-Dutch War over Taiwan in the mid 17th century, but it seems likely Beijing has not.

Read at The Diplomat

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Marco Rubio’s Munich speech was an ultimatum to Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 15, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Salvaging a New START

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 30, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Greenland, NATO, Western Hemisphere

Donald Trump is endangering U.S. alliances

By Christopher McCallion

January 30, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Conceding Donetsk won’t end the war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 28, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved