Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Here are New Year’s resolutions for U.S. foreign policy
Grand strategy, Asia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

December 31, 2024

Here are New Year’s resolutions for U.S. foreign policy

By Daniel DePetris

The end of the year is always bittersweet. On the one hand, it’s a time of joy and happiness, when loved ones come into town for the holidays. Yet on the other hand, there’s always the thought of how it’ll feel to go back to normal after New Year’s Day, when the routine starts up again.

This period, however, should also serve as a moment of reflection. What did we do right over the last 12 months? What did we do wrong? And what changes do I have to make to become a better person? Compiling a list of New Year’s resolutions is as American as apple pie.

New Year’s resolutions aren’t only for regular people. They also apply to the men and women in Washington who are responsible for crafting public policy, particularly if they happen to be members of the vast U.S. foreign policy establishment. These policymakers have made their fair share of mistakes over the last year just like the rest of us.

The list of mistakes is as wide as it is deep. In the Middle East, the United States has very little, if anything, to show for its diplomatic efforts. U.S. officials expend significant time, energy and resources playing peacemaker in a region synonymous in the American mind with pain, sunk costs and crisis. The war between Israel and Hamas grinds on despite periodic cease-fire talks, with the Palestinian death toll approaching 46,000. Lebanon is only just starting to rebuild after Israel’s monthslong air and ground offensive against Hezbollah. A tyrant in Syria is gone, providing millions of Syrians with hope for a better future, but that future could still go either way. Iran, meanwhile, is as close to a nuclear weapon as it has ever been.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

Press ReleaseVenezuela, Americas

Pushing regime change in Venezuela is a terrible idea

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 17, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

Is Trump’s national security strategy really that important?

By Daniel DePetris

October 16, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas

Trump’s unconstitutional forever war against the cartels

By Daniel DePetris

October 4, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Alliances, Global posture

‘Golden Dome’ and a U.S. defence pivot create new challenges for Canada

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 3, 2025

In the mediaAmericas

Proposed ‘gang suppression force’ for Haiti to be larger, more lethal, U.S. says

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

September 26, 2025

op-edAmericas, Venezuela

Trump’s war on ‘narcoterrorists’ is doomed to fail

By Daniel DePetris

September 24, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved