Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Don’t read too much into China’s attendance at Ukraine peace talk
China, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

August 8, 2023

Don’t read too much into China’s attendance at Ukraine peace talk

By Daniel DePetris

Last weekend, Russia pounded Ukrainian positions in the Kharkiv region with a bevy of cruise missiles and one-way attack drones, killing at least four people and destroying a blood transfusion center. The strikes near Ukraine’s second-largest city were part of a systematic wave of attacks involving at least 40 missiles, a sight that has become all too familiar as the war inches toward the 18-month mark.

Nearly 3,000 miles away in Saudi Arabia, delegates from Ukraine, the U.S., Europe and key members of the so-called Global South such as India, South Africa and Brazil were huddling together and talking about peace in Ukraine. Nobody in attendance was naive enough to think that a peace deal was imminent or even likely this year — as White House national security spokesman John Kirby said, the talks in Jeddah weren’t about negotiating an end to the war but rather about discussing what a hypothetical just peace for Ukraine could look like. Given the chasm-like gaps between Ukraine and Russia on what an optimal settlement should consist of, anything more would be setting oneself up for disappointment.

Judging by that very low bar, the talks in Saudi Arabia could be judged a success. More than 40 countries attended the discussions, including China, a fact that wasn’t lost on Western officials who have a habit of grasping at straws for any good news on the war. As the West tells it, China’s attendance at the talks was a significant development because it demonstrated that Beijing was perhaps growing leery of the conflict and growing increasingly agitated about how the Russians have waged it. Perhaps the “no-limits” partnership between China and Russia declared weeks before Russian missiles started flying in Ukrainian cities isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be? Perhaps Chinese President Xi Jinping is getting tired of the war to the point in which he would pressure his friend in the Kremlin to wind it down?

You can sympathize with those who may hold that view. Chinese participation in the Ukraine peace conference was indeed notable, if only because Beijing didn’t send a delegation during the first session in June. This time, China not only showed up but also actively participated and was open to a follow-up meeting in the fall. In the words of one European official, the “mere presence of China shows Russia is more and more isolated” on the world stage. For Kyiv’s supporters in the West, Beijing’s willingness to agree with the general consensus that any end-of-war settlement must respect Ukraine’s sovereignty was seen as a big step in the right direction.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edChina, Asia, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Hegseth is taking the Army on another dead end ride to Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 20, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

It’s Time for Trump and Xi to Meet

By Lyle Goldstein

May 17, 2025

op-edAsia

The Trump administration cools off India-Pakistan conflict — for now

By Daniel DePetris

May 13, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power, Taiwan

China tariffs deal could backfire on Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2025

op-edAsia, Air power, Nuclear weapons

Will India or Pakistan resort to the nuclear option?

By Rajan Menon

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024
virtualChina, Asia, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rocks, reefs, and resolve? Examining the purpose of U.S. policy in the South China Sea

December 12, 2023

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved