Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Burden sharing / Analyzing Trump’s foreign policy and its international implications
Burden sharing, Grand strategy

May 13, 2026

Analyzing Trump’s foreign policy and its international implications

By Benjamin Friedman

In 2016, Ben Friedman wrote, “The Trump Administration Will be Hawkish,” where he argued that despite Trump’s non-interventionist campaign rhetoric, structural forces, hawkish appointees, and an entrenched foreign policy bureaucracy would push him closer toward conventional military interventionism. Ten years later, we asked Ben to revisit his arguments.

Read at War on the Rocks

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

The Latest

In the mediaAsia, Military analysis

Trump scaling down U.S.-South Korea drills could risk more than just joint military readiness

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 20, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is running out of political cover

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 20, 2026

Op-edNorth Korea, Asia

Why Trump Wants To ‘Get The Band Back Together’ With Kim Jong Un

By Daniel DePetris

August 20, 2026

Op-edMiddle East

It’s Time to Pull U.S. Troops from the Middle East

By Alexander Langlois

August 19, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia

Iran war puts new strain on U.S. efforts to deter China

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

August 19, 2026

Explainer

The role of moral hazard in the Ukraine war

By Christopher McCallion

August 18, 2026

Events on Burden sharing

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.