Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / A security dilemma? How China views the AUKUS submarine deal
China, Asia, Nuclear weapons

June 4, 2023

A security dilemma? How China views the AUKUS submarine deal

By Lyle Goldstein

During a recent trip to China, I had the chance to take in the newly renovated Qingdao Chinese Navy Museum. What used to be a sleepy and rusting collection of exotica (near to a more impressive museum about the famous local Tsingtao brew) has now graduated to the big time.

Along with detailed battle maps of actions against the Taiwan Navy from the late 1950s, large-scale dioramas depicting the 1988 action against Vietnam in the South China Sea, and another seemingly demonstrating a hypothetical amphibious assault against Taiwan, one can also find an actual nuclear submarine — quite a striking view.

While that boat was tied up at the pier and not open to visitors, plenty of exhibits inside the cavernous and packed halls extolled the achievements of the Chinese submarine force, from its very first assembled hull in 1957 to the endurance record by a Chinese nuclear submarine in 1985. One can see the mug used by Peng Shilu and the eyeglasses of Huang Xuhua — the two most famous designers of China’s very first nuclear submarine.

While such artifacts might seem a bit quaint, the issue of the intensifying U.S.-China naval rivalry is now in the headlines almost every day, not least due to the recent AUKUS agreement, uniting Australia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. in one single nuclear attack submarine enterprise. This agreement was further solidified at the recently concluded G7 in a meeting between President Joe Biden and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

Read at The Hill

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

In the mediaAsia, Middle East, Military analysis, US‑Israel‑Iran

U.S. weapons shortage from Iran war alarms allies confronting China

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 27, 2026

ExplainerTaiwan, Asia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Accommodation: An underutilized strategy for great-power rivals

By Moritz Graefrath

August 27, 2026

Op-edNorth Korea, Asia

Why Trump Wants To ‘Get The Band Back Together’ With Kim Jong Un

By Daniel DePetris

August 20, 2026

In the mediaAsia, Military analysis

Trump scaling down U.S.-South Korea drills could risk more than just joint military readiness

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 20, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia

Iran war puts new strain on U.S. efforts to deter China

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

August 19, 2026

In the mediaAsia

Donald Trump’s cuts to South Korean military drills stir doubts about U.S. resolve in Asia

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 18, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.