Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / A better way to handle the Panama Canal
Grand strategy, Americas

March 9, 2025

A better way to handle the Panama Canal

By John Kitch II

During his inaugural address in January, President Trump proclaimed that “China is operating the Panama Canal” and promised that the United States would be “taking it back.” Shortly after his confirmation as Secretary of State, Marco Rubio traveled to Panama to meet with its president, José Raúl Mulino.

After the trip, the State Department’s official X account announced that U.S. warships would now be allowed to use the canal for free. Mulino quickly denied the report and said that there had been no new agreement between the United States and Panama to alter the usual fee structure for transiting ships. Rubio’s office noted that he pressed Mulino to reduce Chinese influence on the canal or face possible U.S. action. Mulino countered by publicly saying that the United States had not threatened to upend the treaty that underlies Panama’s operation of the canal.

For now, it appears that the Trump administration has shifted attention to other foreign policy issues. However, this chaotic episode is valuable in that it demonstrates a desire for imperialism under the guise of protecting America’s core security interests.

Read at National Interest

Author

John
Kitch II

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

op-edVenezuela, Americas

Donald Trump brings the war on terrorism to the Caribbean

By Daniel DePetris

October 21, 2025

Press ReleaseVenezuela, Americas

Pushing regime change in Venezuela is a terrible idea

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 17, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

Is Trump’s national security strategy really that important?

By Daniel DePetris

October 16, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas

Trump’s unconstitutional forever war against the cartels

By Daniel DePetris

October 4, 2025

In the mediaAmericas, Alliances, Global posture

‘Golden Dome’ and a U.S. defence pivot create new challenges for Canada

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 3, 2025

In the mediaAmericas

Proposed ‘gang suppression force’ for Haiti to be larger, more lethal, U.S. says

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

September 26, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved