Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Taiwan / Two US scholars say military aid to Taiwan should be conditional
Taiwan, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, China, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

February 26, 2025

Two US scholars say military aid to Taiwan should be conditional

In a Foreign Policy article titled “The Taiwan Fixation” published Tuesday, scholars Jennifer Kavanagh and Stephen Wertheim surveyed the political and economic consequences for the US of allowing Taiwan to come under Beijing’s control. They urged US leaders to create a plan that enables Taiwan’s self-defense while allowing the US to assist “from a distance,” and maintain its position in Asia regardless of a cross-strait conflict’s result.

Kavanagh and Wertheim wrote that this should be done by making US aid conditional on Taiwan’s defense spending and military reforms. They said Taiwan should be required to increase defense spending to 4% of GDP by 2030, and that US President Donald Trump should encourage Taiwan to increase military conscription to two “more intense” years.

Kavanagh and Wertheim wrote that the US’s second condition for military aid should be for Taiwan to develop an “asymmetric denial defense” strategy by boosting anti-ship missiles, sea mines, air defense systems, and cheap drones. They said these systems would make Taiwan better able to defend itself without direct US intervention, compared to the current strategy that prioritizes tanks, fighter jets, submarines, and other large defense assets.

Read at Taiwan News

Featuring

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on Taiwan

See All Events
virtualAsia, China, Grand strategy, Taiwan

Past Virtual Event: Are semiconductors a reason to defend Taiwan?

November 17, 2022
virtualChina, Grand strategy, Taiwan

Past Virtual Event: Taiwan tensions and U.S.-China competition

August 25, 2022

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved