Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / China’s next carrier could be its longest—what are Beijing’s plans?
China, Asia, Military analysis

September 25, 2026

China’s next carrier could be its longest—what are Beijing’s plans?

Lyle Goldstein, director of the Asia program at Defense Priorities, said China was “definitely still in the experimental stage of wielding aircraft carriers” and that he was “not surprised that successive designs are larger and more capable”.

He estimated that a ship of that size could operate perhaps 75 to 90 aircraft, compared with 50 to 60 on the Fujian, and could carry “more robust self-defence systems”.

Janes reported that the carrier’s size reinforced earlier indications that it could be China’s first nuclear-powered surface warship. Goldstein said that assessment “may well be correct”, saying that deploying such technology would be a major leap for China “in terms of power, speed and sustainment”.

Yet even a nuclear-powered carrier would still depend on regular replenishment to keep its aircraft and destroyer escorts operational, Goldstein said.

Goldstein said China appeared “quite focused on a steady expansion of its fleet of replenishment vessels”, a trend visible over many years, and that the navy practised replenishment at sea often, partly because it lacked an extensive network of overseas bases.

However, Goldstein cautioned that “the overall trend for some years in naval strategy has been towards smaller, cheaper, more distributed unmanned assets”, adding that by “doubling down on ‘big decks’, China and the US both seem to be bucking this worldwide trend”.

Read at South China Morning Post

Featuring

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

Op-edAsia, Basing and global posture, China, Military analysis

Tip of the spear, or stranded on beaches? Chinese planners dissect USMC Pacific posture

By Lyle Goldstein

October 20, 2026

Op-edIsrael‑Iran, Asia, China, Middle East

Why the Iran war hasn’t deterred China in East Asia

By Peter Harris

October 18, 2026

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, Military analysis, Military strategy and budget, Taiwan

Is this the best time for U.S. strategists to push for abandoning ambiguity on Taiwan?

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 13, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Grand strategy, Middle East

Great power cooperation in a fragmented world

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 8, 2026

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, Taiwan

America’s commitment to Taiwan is a liability

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 7, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Russia

Turkmenistan grows its arsenal of Chinese air defenses as Russia’s role shrinks

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

October 6, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances and commitments, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and global posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

Defense Priorities Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by donations from individuals and foundations—no funding comes from the U.S. government or any foreign government. Donations are unlimited and deductible for Federal Income Tax purposes.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.