Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq should be a step toward leaving the Middle East
Middle East, Iraq, Syria

January 5, 2020

U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq should be a step toward leaving the Middle East

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 5, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Iraqi parliament voted 170-0 to expel U.S. forces from the country following the U.S. military strike that killed Iranian IRGC commander Qassem Soleimani. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“U.S. forces should have left Iraq and Syria following the defeat of ISIS’s caliphate. And the U.S. should have drawn down militarily from the Middle East long ago. Today’s vote in Iraq’s parliament shows Iraqis agree.

“Sooner or later, Iraqis need to solve their own problems. They know that, and most Americans agree. Rather than entangle U.S. forces in everyone else’s fights, Washington should minimize U.S. participation in avoidable global trouble.

“Leaving Iraq should be a step toward leaving the region. When U.S. forces leave Iraq, they should come home or offshore, not to Kuwait or another garrison in the region where they would remain vulnerable to retaliation.

“The relatively small number of U.S. forces in Iraq, let alone Syria, are too few to conduct the missions they are given—especially with the blowback Soleimani’s killing will cause—but enough to be a tripwire to war with Iran, as events over the past few weeks have demonstrated.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the latest ceasefire and unification deal means for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. couldn’t prop up the Kurds forever

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 4, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump’s global gunboat diplomacy leaves the U.S. overstretched

By Alexander Langlois

February 3, 2026

op-edIran, Middle East

Ignore the Hawks. Attacking Iran comes with huge risks

By Peter Harris

February 1, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. should pull the plug on its Syria deployment

By Daniel DePetris

February 1, 2026

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved