Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Delaying U.S. exit from Afghanistan is fraught with risks
Afghanistan

February 11, 2021

Delaying U.S. exit from Afghanistan is fraught with risks

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 11, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Earlier this month, the Afghanistan Study Group released its report commissioned by Congress. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“A recent report from the Afghanistan Study Group glosses over the most important question the Biden administration should be asking as it conducts its policy review: Is maintaining a U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan past the May 1 withdrawal deadline in the U.S. national interest? All the evidence points to ‘no.’

“The link between a U.S. troop presence and overall stability in Afghanistan is a faulty one. Violence in Afghanistan could very well increase after a U.S. withdrawal, but the same thing is likely to occur if the Biden administration extends U.S. deployments past the early spring—only U.S. soldiers will be at needless risk. The Taliban seem unlikely to tolerate foreign troops operating in Afghanistan beyond May 1. Americans in uniform, who have fortunately avoided combat deaths since the Doha agreement was signed last February, would again be the target of Taliban attacks. U.S. casualties would rise as a result.

“Tying a U.S. troop withdrawal to progress in the intra-Afghan peace talks is also fraught with risks. Direct negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban were delayed for seven months; it took nearly three more months for the parties to even agree on an agenda. Ordering U.S. troops to stay in the middle of a decades-long civil war until Afghans are able to make peace with one other is tantamount to keeping those troops stuck in Afghanistan years into the future.

“The U.S. intervened in Afghanistan for two specific reasons: decimate Al-Qaeda and punish the Taliban for harboring the terrorist group. Both of those objectives were accomplished in the war’s opening months—the U.S. can continue to defend itself from terrorism by utilizing its unmatched intelligence and counterterrorism capabilities. The U.S. has won all it can in Afghanistan. President Biden should keep the U.S. commitment to withdraw and bring all combat forces home.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

Trump fires national security adviser, signaling new China line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 2, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Taiwan

Kavanagh and Wertheim Respond: Why Taiwan’s Survival Depends on Realistic Defense

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Stephen Wertheim

April 28, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

US should look before it leaps into South China Sea

April 18, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

Trump’s Trade War Threatens To Derail U.S.-China Relations

By Daniel DePetris

April 17, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved