Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Grandstanding over Taiwan risks cross-Strait military escalation
China, Taiwan

August 2, 2022

Grandstanding over Taiwan risks cross-Strait military escalation

By Lyle Goldstein

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 2, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi began her anticipated visit to Taiwan where she will meet with Taiwanese officials. Defense Priorities Director of Asia Engagement Lyle Goldstein issued the following statement in response:

“Taiwan is not a playground for U.S. politicians. The security situation in the Taiwan Strait is delicate and hinges to a large degree today on safeguarding the ‘One China’ policy that has preserved the peace for decades. That policy came about as the result of a fundamentally correct rethink of U.S. foreign policy back in the 1970s and has brought about a much more peaceful world. It is no exaggeration to say the future of humanity may depend on a pragmatic U.S.-China relationship—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan needlessly jeopardizes regional stability.

“China’s rising and already very substantial power cannot be ignored or wished away with fine rhetoric. While some countries in the region may prudently wish to increase their own defense expenditures, Washington can no more determine the outcome in the Taiwan Strait than it could determine the future of Afghanistan. Indeed, U.S. intervention in this explosive situation could make matters substantially worse—an all too common theme over the decades from Washington’s irresponsible decision-making.

“To be sure, Taiwan may want to form itself into a ‘porcupine,’ but this may imply digging more bunkers, pouring more concrete, and much more serious training for reserve units rather than buying shiny, new weapons systems from the U.S. like additional fighter aircraft. As demonstrated in Ukraine, some American weapons, such as Javelins, could be very helpful to improving Taiwan’s own A2/AD-style shield, but self-reliance will be Taiwan’s best defense because the U.S. would be unable to adequately supply weaponry to Taiwan in an actual cross-Strait war.

“The U.S. has no vital interests at stake in Taiwan and should no more risk nuclear conflict for this island, a mere 90 miles off the Chinese coast, than it did for Hong Kong. Perhaps if Rep. Pelosi and other congressional leaders truly understood the related national security risks of direct U.S.-China military conflict, they would be less cavalier in putting Americans into the line of fire. This foolish political stunt is unlikely to cause a war in itself, but it will only accelerate the sad process of sleepwalking into a global and national catastrophe at some unspecified time in the future. Preserving Washington’s One China policy and strategic ambiguity are the best approaches to maintain Taiwan’s autonomy.”

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved