Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The case for getting rid of the National Security Strategy
Grand strategy

November 4, 2023

The case for getting rid of the National Security Strategy

By Benjamin Friedman

The Biden administration recently released its first National Security Strategy. As is the custom in Washington, the document was greeted with fanfare by bureaucrats eager to promote their work, beat reporters with deadlines to meet, and think tank pundits, who skim to find mention of their pet issues. But the National Security Strategy is a predictable sham. There is no real strategy to be found there because strategy documents do not prioritize among goals to guide resource allocation.

While national security strategy is unavoidable, “national security strategy” documents should end. The same goes for Quadrennial Defense Reviews and National Defense Strategies. They are a distraction from debate about real strategy—the unofficial but operative kind manifest in the defense budget. Those concerned about the need for strategy should focus on making the budget process more strategic, not on documents that are at best a vacuous public relations exercise.

Read at War on the Rocks

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

The Latest

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Iran’s new leader is more open to pursuing a nuclear weapon, U.S. intelligence says

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 24, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Middle East

U.S. signs landmark nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia that could pave the way for domestic nuclear enrichment

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 23, 2026

Press ReleaseMiddle East, Nuclear weapons

Saudi enrichment risks morphing into U.S. security guarantee

By Rosemary Kelanic

July 22, 2026

Op-edIran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

In Defense of Détente with Iran

By Lyle Goldstein

July 22, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Middle East

Hypocrisy Outrage As Trump Agrees to Saudi Nuclear Deal While Bombing Iran for Nuclear Enrichment

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 22, 2026

Op-edWestern Hemisphere

The U.S. military campaign to stop drug trafficking has failed. It’s time to move on.

By Daniel DePetris

July 21, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.