Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Putin was never going to bend to Trump so easily
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

October 16, 2025

Putin was never going to bend to Trump so easily

By Daniel DePetris

Now that he’s facilitated a ceasefire and hostage release deal between Israel and Hamas, President Trump is already moving on to the next item. He’s a man in a hurry, and while his bid for the Nobel Peace Prize may have failed this year, he has no intention of letting his foot off the pedal. The next conflict to be solved, by Trump’s own admission, is the even deadlier war in Ukraine. “We gotta get that one done,” Trump said during his speech to the Knesset this week. “If you don’t mind, Steve [Witkoff], let’s focus on Russia first. All right?”

The Trump administration is optimistic about the president’s ability to get the war in Ukraine settled. If Trump could pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas into a deal, the reasoning goes, then what’s stopping him from working similar magic on Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky?

The president held a phone call with Putin on Thursday, ahead of a meeting with Zelensky in the White House on Friday. In a social media message after the call, announcing that the Russian and US presidents will meet in Budapest, Trump even made the point explicitly: “I actually believe that the success in the Middle East will help in our negotiation in attaining an end to the war with Russia/Ukraine.”

Unfortunately, international diplomacy doesn’t work like that. While there may be some similarities between the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza (they both started off as a despicable act of aggression) the differences are so numerous that one wonders why US officials would even bother trying to extrapolate lessons from one war to the other.

Read at Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

President Donald Trump’s Ukraine pivot is an opportunity for Europe to step up

By Christopher McCallion

October 16, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s Maximalist Aims Remain Unattainable

By Geoff LaMear

October 11, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

David Petraeus’s Ukraine plan is a blueprint for failure

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 1, 2025

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia likely laughing off Trump’s ‘open door’ to Tomahawks

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 30, 2025

In the mediaEurope and Eurasia, Drones, Military analysis, Russia

Daniel Davis discusses the Russian drone incursions into Danish airspace

Featuring Daniel Davis

September 25, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

NATO rose to the challenge and passed Russia’s test in Poland

By Daniel DePetris

September 16, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved