Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / What will Trump do if the Ukraine peace talks fail?
Ukraine‑Russia, Diplomacy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

April 18, 2025

What will Trump do if the Ukraine peace talks fail?

By Daniel DePetris

With the war in Ukraine now in its fourth year, Trump administration officials, including Donald Trump himself, have spent the last month dialing their Ukrainian colleagues, jetting to foreign capitals to meet with Ukrainian and Russian officials, and huddling with European ministers in an attempt to bring the conflict to a conclusion. The latest meeting happened this week, when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, traveled to Paris for an all-hands session.

Trump, however, doesn’t have much to show for his efforts. U.S. officials continue to put on a brave face and insist that Trump—and only Trump—has the knowledge, skill-set and experience to negotiate an end to Europe’s deadliest war in 80 years. But a confluence of factors outside of his control—namely the actions of the combatants themselves—runs the high risk of killing off Washington’s diplomatic gamble before it has a chance to succeed. Even Trump, who once boastfully declared he could solve the war in 24 hours, is getting increasingly impatient with the entire enterprise.

It’s not like the Trump administration hasn’t notched any wins on the board. Given the intractability of the warring parties, the fact that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was once impervious to negotiations with a tyrant like Vladimir Putin and the sheer hatred accumulated after three years of intense warfare, just getting Ukrainian and Russian officials into a diplomatic process can be labeled progress.

Yet the process hasn’t produced anything but dashed hopes. The March 11 joint statement announcing Kyiv’s support for an unconditional 30-day ceasefire was quickly rejected by Putin, who introduced a slew of questions about who would enforce it, how violators would be punished and when the core issues would be addressed.

Read at Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Putin was never going to bend to Trump so easily

By Daniel DePetris

October 16, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

President Donald Trump’s Ukraine pivot is an opportunity for Europe to step up

By Christopher McCallion

October 16, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s Maximalist Aims Remain Unattainable

By Geoff LaMear

October 11, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

David Petraeus’s Ukraine plan is a blueprint for failure

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 1, 2025

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia likely laughing off Trump’s ‘open door’ to Tomahawks

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 30, 2025

In the mediaEurope and Eurasia, Drones, Military analysis, Russia

Daniel Davis discusses the Russian drone incursions into Danish airspace

Featuring Daniel Davis

September 25, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved