Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Yemen / Signalgate is distracting us from more serious issues in Yemen
Yemen, Houthis, Middle East

April 1, 2025

Signalgate is distracting us from more serious issues in Yemen

By Daniel DePetris

It has been a rough week for national security adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the rest of the Trump administration’s national security team. The so-called Signalgate catastrophe, in which Waltz organized a top-secret chat on the Signal messenger application about pending U.S. airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen, only to accidentally add one of Washington’s most famous journalists to the conversation, is the epitome of a blunder. The White House’s attempts at damage control — at one point, Waltz insisted he couldn’t pick journalist Jeffrey Goldberg out of a lineup, only for an old picture to surface of the two of them standing next to each other at the French Embassy in Washington — has created only more problems.

The Washington punditocracy sees blood in the water. So do Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who have called on Waltz and Hegseth to resign for sharing top-secret information through an unclassified channel. The Senate Armed Services Committee has called for an investigation by the Defense Department’s inspector general. And a federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to preserve the Signal messages for the public record. The whole thing is one big, embarrassing scandal.

This is a serious issue. If any junior analyst in the U.S. government acted the way Waltz or Hegseth did, they would have been fired immediately. Sharing war plans outside U.S. government systems is the kind of offense that is almost too stupid to commit. And just reading that a journalist was invited to the chat makes one’s IQ score drop.

Even so, Signalgate is such an obsession that it’s clouding discussions that are more important than the intra-administration knife fights the pundits love to cover. For instance, we’ve spent more time over the last week debating whether Waltz should be shown the door than we have in scrutinizing whether an extensive U.S. strike campaign in Yemen will actually work. And at a time when so many are worried about America’s system of checks and balances becoming an artifact, I find it ironic that nobody seems to care about the president in effect declaring war on his own.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Maximalism will doom diplomacy with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Middle East

As Donald Trump prepares for Middle East visit, his efforts there aren’t inspiring

By Daniel DePetris

May 6, 2025

Press ReleaseHouthis, Air power, Middle East, Military analysis, Yemen

Ending strikes on Yemen: Good news if it sticks

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 6, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump needs his team on the same Iran page

By Daniel DePetris

May 5, 2025

op-edYemen, Air power, Houthis, Iran, Middle East

In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an ‘airpower trap’ that has drawn past US presidents into costly wars

By William Walldorf

May 5, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

Events on Yemen

See All Events
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved