Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Yemen / Signalgate is distracting us from more serious issues in Yemen
Yemen, Houthis, Middle East

April 1, 2025

Signalgate is distracting us from more serious issues in Yemen

By Daniel DePetris

It has been a rough week for national security adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the rest of the Trump administration’s national security team. The so-called Signalgate catastrophe, in which Waltz organized a top-secret chat on the Signal messenger application about pending U.S. airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen, only to accidentally add one of Washington’s most famous journalists to the conversation, is the epitome of a blunder. The White House’s attempts at damage control—at one point, Waltz insisted he couldn’t pick journalist Jeffrey Goldberg out of a lineup, only for an old picture to surface of the two of them standing next to each other at the French Embassy in Washington—has created only more problems.

The Washington punditocracy sees blood in the water. So do Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who have called on Waltz and Hegseth to resign for sharing top-secret information through an unclassified channel. The Senate Armed Services Committee has called for an investigation by the Defense Department’s inspector general. And a federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to preserve the Signal messages for the public record. The whole thing is one big, embarrassing scandal.

This is a serious issue. If any junior analyst in the U.S. government acted the way Waltz or Hegseth did, they would have been fired immediately. Sharing war plans outside U.S. government systems is the kind of offense that is almost too stupid to commit. And just reading that a journalist was invited to the chat makes one’s IQ score drop.

Even so, Signalgate is such an obsession that it’s clouding discussions that are more important than the intra-administration knife fights the pundits love to cover. For instance, we’ve spent more time over the last week debating whether Waltz should be shown the door than we have in scrutinizing whether an extensive U.S. strike campaign in Yemen will actually work. And at a time when so many are worried about America’s system of checks and balances becoming an artifact, I find it ironic that nobody seems to care about the president in effect declaring war on his own.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran

America’s relationship with Israel is a moral hazard

By William Walldorf

August 26, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Israel, Syria

Donald Trump tries to make history in Syria and Lebanon

By Daniel DePetris

August 26, 2025

op-edSyria, Middle East

Trump’s Syria gamble

By Daniel DePetris

August 22, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

The U.S. must stop enabling Israel’s destruction of Gaza

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 14, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

Events on Yemen

See All Events
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved