Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / The Trump administration’s first trip to Europe spurs more questions than answers
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

February 18, 2025

The Trump administration’s first trip to Europe spurs more questions than answers

By Daniel DePetris

If our European allies were hoping for reassurance from President Donald Trump’s administration during the Munich Security Conference in Germany last weekend, then they left the hotel ballroom sadly disappointed. The multiday event, previously used by senior foreign policy officials as a platform for convincing the rest of the world that the transatlantic alliance is alive and thriving, was a setting for anxiety and trepidation this year.

Europe’s leaders of course understood that the Trump White House wouldn’t be as mealymouthed and committed to the old security paradigm as Joe Biden was when he was president. But even the European delegates in the room came away shocked with what Trump administration officials were saying. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, for instance, delivered a bold speech during the conference’s opening day by spouting some hard truths: Ukraine is unlikely to get all of its territory back, the U.S. won’t be sending in its own troops to enforce any ceasefire (assuming one gets hashed out) and European militaries need to get serious about investing in hard power if they want to be something more than irrelevant bystanders.

Vice President JD Vance didn’t even bother talking about Ukraine or Russia, choosing to instead blast European political elites for shutting out far-right parties from acceptable political discourse. The Europeans were aghast; when it was his turn to speak, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius denounced Vance’s assertion that free speech in Europe was under assault.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Poland’s drone scare is not grounds for Nato escalation

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 12, 2025

op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

EU elites are finally waking up to the collapse of the world as they knew it

By Daniel DePetris

September 10, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

For Putin, bargaining and bombing aren’t mutually exclusive

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 9, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia

Daniel Davis assesses the potential for Russia-Ukraine peace on NewsNation

Featuring Daniel Davis

September 8, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Is the West fooling itself on Ukraine security guarantees?

By Daniel DePetris

September 3, 2025

op-edAlliances, NATO, Ukraine‑Russia

Who will wield all those shiny new weapons?

By Gil Barndollar

September 3, 2025

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved