Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / EU elites are finally waking up to the collapse of the world as they knew it
Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

September 10, 2025

EU elites are finally waking up to the collapse of the world as they knew it

By Daniel DePetris

When Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un travelled to Beijing to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping, Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top foreign policy official, felt compelled to send a message. “Looking at President Xi standing alongside the leaders of Russia, Iran, [and] North Korea in Beijing today, these aren’t just anti-Western optics,” she said. “This is a direct challenge to the international system built on rules.”

Such appeals to what is often described as the “rules-based order” are a dime a dozen in the West. Whether it’s the EU bureaucracy, the Elysée, the US national security apparatus or Congress, European and American officials like to contrast their cast-iron commitment to this “order” against the revisionists—like Putin or Xi—who are challenging some of the most fundamental norms of the international system. If they repeat their favoured catch-phrase enough times, they seem to believe, they can galvanise the West into rebuilding a world of stable borders, predictable rules, and respected international organisations.

The European Union, at least, is beginning to see reality: if there was ever such a thing as the international rules-based order, it’s going extinct. “We are witnessing the erosion of the rules-based international order and fracturing of the global landscape,” the EU’s new Strategic Foresight Report warns. “From the United Nations to the World Trade Organisation, key pillars of the global order are under stress… A return to the previous status quo seems increasingly unlikely.”

Read at Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Drone Dominance Isn’t the Vital Lesson of Ukraine

By Gil Barndollar

May 5, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East

The costs of Trump’s contempt are starting to show

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 24, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia and Ukraine trade attacks as the Iran war pulls U.S. attention away

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 23, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia Wins the War on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 14, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Iran war has given Putin leverage over Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 12, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.