Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / U.S. withdrawal would force local actors to solve Syria’s problems
Middle East, Syria

October 23, 2019

U.S. withdrawal would force local actors to solve Syria’s problems

By Edward King

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 23, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Wednesday, President Trump announced Turkey will observe a permanent ceasefire in Syria and the U.S. will lift sanctions in response. Defense Priorities President Edward King issued the following statement in response:

“Moving U.S. forces from northern Syria was needlessly hasty and reckless, but it has compelled local powers to search for a new, durable equilibrium for the region. The alternative is a permanent U.S. commitment with grave risks and no justifying interests. Assuming the ceasefire holds, it could help wind down the years-long civil war that has turned Syria into rubble and shift the burden of its reconstruction to local actors.

“The strongest policy for the U.S. is a methodical, full withdrawal of its military forces—including from the oil fields in eastern Syria and the southern base at al-Tanf—not to another Middle East country, but home. The U.S. should be doing less in the Middle East, a region of diminishing strategic importance. Washington should not confuse the region’s violent political problems with U.S. security and prosperity, which are separate.

“The U.S. is safe despite two decades of Middle East wars, not because of them. There are more U.S. troops deployed to the Middle East now than under President Obama, and President Trump has yet to fully exit any military conflicts he inherited. He should start by ending the U.S. interventions in Syria, Afghanistan, and Yemen.”

Author

Photo of Edward King

Edward
King

Founder & President

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Why the Israel-Iran ceasefire feels like a strategic failure

By Alexander Langlois

July 8, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Don’t bet on a Gaza ceasefire

July 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

What comes next in the Israeli-Iranian conflict?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 30, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved