Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / U.S. should rule out NATO as an option for Ukraine and Georgia
NATO, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

October 19, 2021

U.S. should rule out NATO as an option for Ukraine and Georgia

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 19, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin is in Ukraine, where he expressed support for Ukraine’s NATO aspirations, a day after extending a security pact with Georgia. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“NATO already commits the U.S. to too many useless allies—but admitting Ukraine and Georgia to the alliance is flat out dangerous. Given that Russia occupies Crimea, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia, the accession of either Ukraine or Georgia to NATO would involve the U.S. in a territorial conflict and increase the risk of war with Russia—for no clear benefit.

“Secretary Austin is right that ‘Ukraine has a right to decide its own future foreign policy,’ but that doesn’t mean they have a right to join NATO and have the United States threaten to kill large numbers of people on their behalf. The prospect of being defended by the U.S. may undermine Ukrainian willingness to accept that their geography demands they make unpleasant sacrifices for peace.

“Ukraine and Georgia will never matter as much to the U.S. as they do to Russia, and therefore threats to fight what might a be nuclear war on their behalf will never be credible. Pretending otherwise helps no one.

“The U.S. should state unambiguously that NATO membership is not an option for either.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on NATO

In the mediaAlliances and commitments, Military analysis, NATO

Allies fear Trump will target NATO in case of midterm loss

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

November 1, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

An EU-style Article 4 mechanism would be insignificant

By Daniel DePetris

September 30, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

What really matters when Burnham meets Trump

By Daniel DePetris

September 22, 2026

In the mediaAlliances and commitments, China, NATO

Allies into foes. Foes into allies. What’s behind Trump’s world order?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

September 5, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, NATO

As The CIA Director Warns Putin Not to Take Advantage of U.S. Munitions Shortages, Europe Moves Away From Dependence on American Weapons and Security Guarantees

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 31, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Russia does not want a war with Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances and commitments, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances and commitments, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances and commitments, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

Defense Priorities Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by donations from individuals and foundations—no funding comes from the U.S. government or any foreign government. Donations are unlimited and deductible for Federal Income Tax purposes.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.