Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / U.S. foreign policy priorities for the next four years
Grand strategy, Alliances, Asia, Middle East

November 3, 2020

U.S. foreign policy priorities for the next four years

By Edward King

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 3, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Tonight, all votes will have been cast for the next President of the United States. Defense Priorities outlined U.S. foreign policy priorities for the next four years in a new explainer, and President Edward King issued the following statement:

“No matter the election outcome, the next four years are an opportunity for the U.S. to pursue a new, more realistic foreign policy that strengthens the country and benefits the American people.

“In addition to fulfilling the urgent task of ending endless wars, the U.S. should reassess its military presence in the Middle East, a region of limited and diminishing strategic importance. While sometimes chaotic, the regional powers balance each other. The U.S. should abandon efforts to dominate Middle East politics by military force and instead focus on the narrow mission of thwarting anti-U.S. terror threats. U.S. forces in the region should move offshore, with most coming home.

“Europe is prosperous and peaceful. Wealthy NATO allies should take primary responsibility for the continent’s defense. Burden shifting will not only free up limited U.S. resources, but also ease tensions with nuclear superpower Russia.

“Asia remains more an opportunity to enhance economic prosperity than an arena defined by security competition. While China’s rise is something to watch closely, U.S. policy should not overreact. As in Europe, prosperous, technologically advanced allies should be encouraged to invest in defensive capabilities to strengthen deterrence, conserving U.S. energy and allowing us to focus on growing our economy, the foundation of American power.

“The U.S. faces profound challenges, but most of them are domestic or not amenable to military solutions. Abandoning the failure of the last 20 years in favor of restraint will mean a stronger America with more security at less cost and risk. The next four years should mark a new direction for U.S. foreign policy.”

Author

Photo of Edward King

Edward
King

Founder & President

Defense Priorities

More on Grand strategy

In the mediaGlobal posture, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

The meaning of “America First” is in flux

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

op-edVenezuela, Grand strategy

Why Trump’s Venezuela adventurism is a strategic disaster

By Alexander Langlois

January 16, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, Venezuela

Wars without clear purpose erode presidential legacies, and Trump risks political consequences with further military action in Venezuela

By William Walldorf

January 13, 2026

op-edEurope and Eurasia, Grand strategy, NATO

Trump, Greenland, and American Foreign Policy in the 21st Century

By John Kitch II

January 12, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Asia, China, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

No, America is not adopting a ‘spheres-of-influence’ doctrine

By Daniel DePetris

January 10, 2026

op-edVenezuela, Americas, Grand strategy

Trump’s backyard imperialism won’t work

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 9, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved