Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / The real U.S. energy security problem—and how to fix it
Grand strategy, China, Middle East, Ukraine‑Russia

March 27, 2026

The real U.S. energy security problem—and how to fix it

By Rosemary Kelanic

The United States has an oil security problem. The economic damage of a global oil shock would disproportionately harm the United States compared to its peers including China, Russia, and the European Union. That may seem surprising. The United States became a net exporter in 2020, currently leads the world in oil production, and its 2024 output of 20 million barrels per day (mb/d) was the highest ever recorded by a single country. But production and export levels do not drive economic vulnerability to oil shocks. Oil trades in a global market at one global market price. Sudden price spikes affect everyone consuming oil across the global market, regardless of individual countries’ output levels.

The United States is disproportionately susceptible to price spikes because U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) relies more heavily on oil consumption, dollar per dollar, than peer economies. What determines a country’s vulnerability to price shocks is the oil intensity of its economy, i.e., how much oil consumption is required to generate each unit of GDP. The more heavily a country’s economic output depends on oil, the greater the damage it is likely to suffer from sudden oil price increases. Unfortunately, the oil intensity of the U.S. economy is among the highest in the world and eclipses that of any other major power, even China—which is surprising, because in many ways China is still a developing country, and developing countries tend to be less oil efficient than fully industrialized countries. Because U.S. economic output relies more heavily on oil consumption than any of its peers or rivals, it is likely that oil price spikes would disproportionately damage its economy. Thus, the oil security problem confronting the United States is not “just” a prosperity issue, but a matter of relative economic gains (and losses) in the event of an oil shock, with ramifications for the balance of power.

The nature of U.S. oil vulnerability remains poorly understood, even by policy experts and the informed public, as myths and misconceptions have clouded energy issues for decades. It has been apparent to Washington since the early 1970s that the United States faces an oil security problem, however murky the official understanding of it may be, and that the political volatility of the Middle East, the world’s most important oil producing region, raises the potential for supply disruptions. The flexibility of oil markets can cushion the impact of disruptions more than policymakers realize, but the United States and other countries use policy tools to provide additional insurance beyond market adaptation. Unfortunately, policymakers’ misunderstandings of the oil market have led the United States to adopt policies that are ineffective, costly, or misguided.

Read at Washington Quarterly

Author

Rosemary
Kelanic

Director, Middle East Program

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Iran’s new leader is more open to pursuing a nuclear weapon, U.S. intelligence says

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 24, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Middle East

U.S. signs landmark nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia that could pave the way for domestic nuclear enrichment

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 23, 2026

Press ReleaseMiddle East, Nuclear weapons

Saudi enrichment risks morphing into U.S. security guarantee

By Rosemary Kelanic

July 22, 2026

Op-edIran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

In Defense of Détente with Iran

By Lyle Goldstein

July 22, 2026

In the mediaNuclear weapons, Middle East

Hypocrisy Outrage As Trump Agrees to Saudi Nuclear Deal While Bombing Iran for Nuclear Enrichment

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 22, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump Needs to Defy History to End the Iran War

By William Walldorf

July 21, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.