Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / U.S. arms sales should not promote Saudi and Emirati recklessness
Middle East, Deterrence, Yemen

January 27, 2021

U.S. arms sales should not promote Saudi and Emirati recklessness

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 27, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The Wall Street Journal reported the Biden administration has imposed a temporary freeze on all U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The freeze in arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE is a good first step in recalibrating U.S. policy toward those states. Hopefully it also augurs a more distant and neutral U.S. policy in the Middle East, one where U.S. power ceases to enable Saudi and Emirati recklessness.

“Under a misguided policy begun under President Obama and continued under President Trump, despite congressional votes to stop it, U.S. arms and intelligence aided Saudi and UAE involvement in Yemen’s civil war, exacerbating the humanitarian disaster there. By fully removing its support, including arms sales used for airstrikes, the U.S. can pressure the Saudis and their Yemeni allies to offer terms to Houthis that ends the war.

“The U.S. should stop pretending the Saudis and the Emiratis are U.S. allies. Handling them with kid gloves and backing their aggressive polices—toward Yemen, Qatar, and Iran—has been locally destabilizing and contrary to U.S. interests. We should not treat them as enemies or permanently refuse to sell them any weapons system (air and missile defense components for example), but underwriting their misdeeds should stop. A balance of regional powers is best for U.S. interests—taking sides and intervening on behalf of the Gulf States is a proven failure.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s War of Choice in Iran

By Alexander Langlois

March 6, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

War on Iran Will Squander America’s Military Edge

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 6, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Iran has a strategy for defeating the U.S. It might just work

By Daniel DePetris

March 5, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

On NBC News, Daniel Davis discusses Ukraine’s role in U.S.-Iran war

Featuring Daniel Davis

March 5, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Hegseth finds his footing as Epic Fury’s front man

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

March 5, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

TAC Right Now: The Iran Catastrophe

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

March 5, 2026

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualMiddle East

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Middle East Edition

January 14, 2026
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.