Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Try to save Ukrainians by closing NATO’s door to Kyiv
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

February 18, 2022

Try to save Ukrainians by closing NATO’s door to Kyiv

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 18, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Joe Biden spoke from the White House, saying he is convinced Russia will invade Ukraine. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Many commentators are reasonably skeptical that just Washington removing the possibility of NATO expansion to Ukraine would prevent a Russian invasion, since Russia makes other demands. But the fact is that such an offer, as part of a diplomatic package also dealing with missile deployments, military exercises, and perhaps more, might prevent a Russian invasion of Ukraine, though it would not exhaust Russian complaints.

“Washington’s failure to make such an offer is negligent, immoral and potentially catastrophic for Ukraine, the country U.S. leaders so loudly claim to be helping.

“U.S. officials have shown they would rather risk an invasion than give in on either the principle of NATO’s open door or the principle that you don’t surrender anything in the face of threats. But the first principle is fake, since NATO’s door is open and closed by members, including Americans. And the second principle does violence to how great powers historically avoid wars. The balancing of armies and nuclear-armed states involves compromise with coercion. Saying one should never give in to it, especially when nothing important is at stake, is childish.

“That Ukraine’s fate may turn on concessions the U.S. could make is the result of decades of failed strategy trying to extend U.S. dominance further east in Europe with increasingly dodgy promises. American officials should not be so involved in a fight between Russia and Ukraine. You can take sides morally, but it is fundamentally not our fight. Having foolishly thrust ourselves into this role, U.S. behavior has been utterly negligent, pushing Ukraine toward a confrontation it cannot win.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Ukraine-Russia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Conceding Donetsk won’t end the war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 28, 2026

op-edRussia, Ukraine‑Russia

Seizing empty Russian oil tanker doesn’t serve America’s interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 8, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

Daniel Davis critiques the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Ukraine-Russia war: LBC

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 6, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky-Trump meeting produced no winners

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 29, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s security promise to Ukraine may be more dangerous than it looks

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 26, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s own pragmatism demands ‘armed un-alignment’

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 22, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved