Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / The U.S. should withdraw from Afghanistan without any conditions
Afghanistan

February 29, 2020

The U.S. should withdraw from Afghanistan without any conditions

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 29, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The New York Times reported details of the U.S.-Taliban deal that could lead to a withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Afghanistan. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“While an agreement is welcome, ending America’s longest war should not be hitched to a deal between the Taliban, Kabul, or anyone else. The full withdrawal should be completed within 14 months regardless of the other conditions outlined in the agreement—the Taliban should not get a veto over U.S. policy.

“The U.S. was right to invade Afghanistan to destroy Al-Qaeda and punish the Taliban. The mistake was staying after that swift victory to nation build. Nearly two decades later, the U.S. remains mired in training and policing missions related to Kabul’s security, not America’s.

“It is true Afghanistan will likely get worse when the U.S. leaves, but it is also true that’s going to be the case even if the U.S. stays another two months, two years, or two decades. Afghanistan is not strategically important to the United States. Pretending otherwise, especially to continue pursuing fantastical goals inconsequential to U.S. security, will further weaken the U.S.—and still result in costly failure.

“As has been true for years, the strongest, most responsible policy for the U.S. is a complete military withdrawal from Afghanistan, with or without an agreement. Anything less would only increase the human and financial costs of the forever war.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved