Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / The U.S. should leave Afghanistan now, on its own terms
Afghanistan

February 14, 2020

The U.S. should leave Afghanistan now, on its own terms

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 14, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Associated Press reported the U.S. and the Taliban have reached a seven-day “reduction in violence” agreement that could pave the way to a U.S. troop drawdown. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“An agreement that brings the Taliban and Kabul closer together should be welcomed, but no signed agreement is necessary for the U.S. to leave on its own terms. The U.S. is safe because of its overwhelming military capabilities, not because of ground troops in Afghanistan. That mission is about Kabul’s security, not America’s.

“Leaving a permanent ‘residual counterterror force’ would be a mistake that merely puts a new face on the same ground mission. America can easily remain safe from any anti-U.S. terrorist threats originating in Afghanistan without a permanent military presence there. As demonstrated by the raids that took out ISIS leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi and AQAP leader Qassim al-Rimi, U.S. strike capabilities don’t require a permanent military presence.

“U.S. military power is also a potent deterrent, which is why the Taliban have self-interested reasons—their desire to avoid being attacked again—to suppress Al-Qaeda, whether or not they sign a document saying they’ll do so.

“The U.S. military mission after 9/11 to clobber Al-Qaeda and punish the Taliban government for hosting it was accomplished shortly after the 2001 invasion. Nearly two decades later, we remain mired in a nation building mission disconnected from U.S. security. What is imperative now is getting militarily disentangled from Afghanistan’s problems. We must end the war now and completely withdraw quickly.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

Trump fires national security adviser, signaling new China line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 2, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Taiwan

Kavanagh and Wertheim Respond: Why Taiwan’s Survival Depends on Realistic Defense

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Stephen Wertheim

April 28, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

US should look before it leaps into South China Sea

April 18, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

Trump’s Trade War Threatens To Derail U.S.-China Relations

By Daniel DePetris

April 17, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved