Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / The U.S. is better off out of Afghanistan
Afghanistan

August 30, 2021

The U.S. is better off out of Afghanistan

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 30, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, U.S. officials announced the last American planes have left Afghanistan, bringing an end to America’s longest war. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“As great a tragedy as the war has been, it can still be worse if we listen to those who blame all Afghanistan’s problems on the U.S. exit and tell us there was a competent way to do it.

“The great error of the war in Afghanistan wasn’t its ending, whatever the mistakes made in the final U.S. exit. The problem was continuing to participate in the war so long in the face of so many indications it was failing—indeed, that it would’ve been worthwhile even had it worked better. The Biden administration deserves credit for staying focused on the national interest and getting out despite the chorus of Washington establishment howls lamenting the war’s end.

“The U.S. exit comes at least a decade too late. By 2002, the United States had accomplished the aims that justified our invasion of Afghanistan, with Al-Qaeda’s leaders dead, captured, on the run, and the Taliban punished for hosting them. As that war was won, a new unwinnable one began, when the United States slid into a growing nation-building campaign unnecessary to U.S. security.

“Certainly by the time a U.S. raid killed Osama bin Laden in 2011, it was clear that U.S. counterterrorism aims could be achieved without trying to turn Afghanistan into a modern state with a unified and competent government. U.S. forces should already have largely departed by then, rather than being surged for a massive counterinsurgency campaign. The terrible costs of those decisions are well known: more than a trillion dollars wasted, 2,461 U.S. servicemembers and civilians killed, and many more Afghans lost, mostly for nothing lasting: to build a state that proved a failed one.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Military analysis

America needs to take better care of its military

By Dan Caldwell

July 28, 2025

ExplainerNATO, China, Russia

Keep NATO focused on Europe, not China

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 24, 2025

op-edAsia, Burden sharing, China, Naval power, Taiwan

AUKUS is a flawed but sensible way to burden-share in the Pacific

By Lyle Goldstein

July 14, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved