Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / The only important U.S. security interest in Syria is avoiding a major war
Syria, Middle East

February 12, 2020

The only important U.S. security interest in Syria is avoiding a major war

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 12, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The Wall Street Journal reported U.S. and Syrian forces traded gunfire in northeast Syria. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The few hundred U.S. troops in Syria are too few to accomplish much, but they’re enough spark a wider war. Today’s shootout with Syrian forces is another reminder that it’s past time to withdraw all U.S. forces from Syria. Without evident purpose, the mission there turns U.S. soldiers into targets and risks dragging the U.S. into another long war in the Middle East.

“Syria is full of risks of escalation without payoff. Along with the tensions with the Syrian Army, recent reports indicate U.S. forces have clashed with Russians in Syria. There’s also a danger of conflict with Iranian-backed forces.

“After the fall of ISIS’s caliphate, the U.S. military has been assigned an aimless mission in the country, ostensibly focused on denying oil revenue to the scattered and weak remnants of ISIS. In reality, it is denying territory and oil to Syrian leader Bashar al Assad in a confused effort to delay the Syrian government from retaking control of its country.

“At this point, the only important U.S. security interest at stake in Syria is avoiding a major war. Staying needlessly jeopardizes U.S. soldiers’ lives and invites a broader, no-win conflict. All U.S. forces should leave, and the U.S. should use its diplomatic leverage to convince its NATO ally Turkey to de-escalate.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Why the Israel-Iran ceasefire feels like a strategic failure

By Alexander Langlois

July 8, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Don’t bet on a Gaza ceasefire

July 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

What comes next in the Israeli-Iranian conflict?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 30, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved