Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / Sanctions will harm Iran, but they are not cost-free for the U.S. and are likely to backfire
Iran, Middle East, Sanctions

April 22, 2019

Sanctions will harm Iran, but they are not cost-free for the U.S. and are likely to backfire

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 22, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Trump administration announced it will no longer provide sanctions waivers for nations, including U.S. allies, if they buy oil from Iran after current exemptions expire on May 2. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The decision not to renew waivers on Iranian oil sanctions is short-sighted, won’t change the regime’s behavior, and will have a higher cost than benefit for the United States.

“The administration’s hope is that economic hardship brought on by sanctions will move the Iranian people to overthrow their government. It is far more likely that hardship will be blamed on the U.S., cause nationalist outrage against the west, and increase Iranian support for hardliners and harm moderates looking to cut more encompassing deals.

“In addition to risking a crisis or war with Iran, these actions are also likely to damage U.S. allies in Europe. And because the sanctions abuse U.S. financial hegemony, they incentivize alternatives to the U.S.-led global financial system and threaten a major source of America’s economic power.

“These risks might be worthwhile if the U.S. truly could not live with the current Iranian government—but we can live with them. The Iranian regime is a problematic actor, but it is not a major threat to Americans today. Whatever threat it does pose to the U.S. should be managed through deterrence and diplomacy.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Iran

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

What Does the Iran War Mean for the Global Economy?

By Rosemary Kelanic

June 2, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Donald Trump’s Iran War Could Become America’s ‘Syracuse’—the Disaster That Ended an Empire

By Gil Barndollar

May 29, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Both Iran And U.S. Lost The War, But The U.S. Lost More: Geopolitics Expert

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

May 29, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s Least Bad Option in Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

May 28, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump Isn’t ‘Satisfied’ With Iran Deal—What Do We Know About A Potential Agreement?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

May 27, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

On BBC, Ben Friedman argues for the United States to cut a deal with Iran to open the strait

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

May 27, 2026

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.