Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Resolving the Ukraine-Russia crisis requires diplomacy, not troop deployments
Ukraine‑Russia, Diplomacy, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

February 2, 2022

Resolving the Ukraine-Russia crisis requires diplomacy, not troop deployments

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 2, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the U.S. announced it will deploy 3,000 U.S. troops to NATO allies in Europe. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Deploying more troops to European allies’ territory is a symbolic act that won’t solve the Ukraine problem. Now there will be roughly 67,000 active duty troops in Europe instead of 65,000. Were these new troops a bargaining chip that could be traded for Russian concessions, they might have some value. But they seem instead to be permanent, an irritant for Russia designed to show resolve. In that sense they are essentially a distraction from the drama around Ukraine and diplomatic efforts to solve it.

“Rather than deploy troops, the U.S. should admit it won’t expand NATO to Ukraine or let NATO troops deploy there. Instead, U.S. leaders insist on risking Ukraine now for the principle that we might defend it later. Ending this absurd policy will do far more for Ukraine than stationing a few more troops in Europe.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What’s behind Trump’s Ukraine weapons U-Turn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

The case for cutting off weapons to Ukraine

By Dan Caldwell

July 6, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Pentagon pauses some weapons for Ukraine, experts weigh in on U.S. priorities

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

MAGA faithful cheer Trump for pausing Ukraine weapons after bristling at Iran strikes

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s silence on loss of Ukraine lithium territory speaks volumes

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved