Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / Reduce U.S. troops in Europe, don’t send more to Poland
Europe and Eurasia, Burden sharing, Russia

June 24, 2020

Reduce U.S. troops in Europe, don’t send more to Poland

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
June 24, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, in a press conference with Polish President Andrzej Duda, President Trump remarked a number of U.S. troops in Germany will probably be moved to Poland. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The United States doesn’t need more forces in Poland—or anywhere in Europe for that matter. Whether they come from Germany or Fort Drum, adding U.S. forces to Poland does nothing to enhance U.S. security and undermines efforts to reduce U.S. defense burdens in Europe.

“Though Poland’s current government seems eager to gain U.S. support as it antagonizes Russia, that is not in our national interest. With a GDP smaller than Italy’s hurt by energy prices and a shrinking labor force, Russia remains a limited conventional threat beyond its borders. If there is a need for greater protection in Poland, Warsaw should start by asking its European neighbors for help. The U.S. already does too much for European security.

“We should put troops where they are needed to secure U.S. interests. Neither Poland nor Germany is a good candidate in that sense. If European nations do more because fewer U.S. forces are defending them—good. If they do nothing different due to the limited threat from Russia or anyone else, that too is fine. The U.S. limits costs and risks in either case.

“The U.S., buffeted by coronavirus, exploding debt, and domestic troubles should focus more on getting its own act together and less on responding to alarmism about Russia—especially on behalf of wealthy nations. The U.S. should shift burdens on to European allies, not take on more.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe and Eurasia

Op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Breaking Europe’s Trans-Atlantic Habit: The End of the Senior Partner Myth

By Moritz Graefrath

February 24, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Marco Rubio’s Munich speech was an ultimatum to Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 15, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Grand strategy, Russia

Trump awards final contracts under U.S.-Finnish icebreaker partnership to Canada-linked defense company

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 11, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.