Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / Reduce U.S. troops in Europe, don’t send more to Poland
Europe and Eurasia, Burden sharing, Russia

June 24, 2020

Reduce U.S. troops in Europe, don’t send more to Poland

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
June 24, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, in a press conference with Polish President Andrzej Duda, President Trump remarked a number of U.S. troops in Germany will probably be moved to Poland. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The United States doesn’t need more forces in Poland—or anywhere in Europe for that matter. Whether they come from Germany or Fort Drum, adding U.S. forces to Poland does nothing to enhance U.S. security and undermines efforts to reduce U.S. defense burdens in Europe.

“Though Poland’s current government seems eager to gain U.S. support as it antagonizes Russia, that is not in our national interest. With a GDP smaller than Italy’s hurt by energy prices and a shrinking labor force, Russia remains a limited conventional threat beyond its borders. If there is a need for greater protection in Poland, Warsaw should start by asking its European neighbors for help. The U.S. already does too much for European security.

“We should put troops where they are needed to secure U.S. interests. Neither Poland nor Germany is a good candidate in that sense. If European nations do more because fewer U.S. forces are defending them—good. If they do nothing different due to the limited threat from Russia or anyone else, that too is fine. The U.S. limits costs and risks in either case.

“The U.S., buffeted by coronavirus, exploding debt, and domestic troubles should focus more on getting its own act together and less on responding to alarmism about Russia—especially on behalf of wealthy nations. The U.S. should shift burdens on to European allies, not take on more.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe and Eurasia

Op-edEurope and Eurasia

New prime minister assumes the reins as Britain struggles

By Daniel DePetris

July 21, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Quiet U.S. pullback in Eastern Europe sparks wider allied worries

July 16, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Bring the Troops Home, Mr. President

By Anthony Constantini

July 16, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Daniel Davis discusses Russian strikes into the Black Sea on NBC News

Featuring Daniel Davis

July 14, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

UNRWA fight overshadows Brussels donor summit

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 10, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

China Again Warns Russia Not to Use Nuclear Arms Against Ukraine

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 10, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.