Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine / Quit bluffing about defending Ukraine
Ukraine, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

November 11, 2021

Quit bluffing about defending Ukraine

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 11, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—In a recent meeting with the Ukrainian foreign minister, Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated that the U.S. has an “ironclad” commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“In once more speaking of an ‘ironclad’ commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, Secretary Blinken vaguely suggests the U.S. might fight for Ukraine, a threat no one—least of all Russia—will believe. This talk is far more likely to encourage desperate Ukrainian beliefs the U.S. will somehow protect them than to deter Russia. And if Russia did somehow believe U.S. intervention on behalf of Ukraine was plausible, it could be encouraged to swallow a sizable chunk of Ukraine in a fait accompli, before U.S. aid materialized. Blinken should have simply expressed support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and left it there.

“U.S. interests, not a sense of justice that casts Russia as an evil enemy, should govern our policy toward Ukraine. The United States cannot match Russian interests in Ukraine and thus cannot make credible threats to defend it militarily. To solve its problems, Ukraine needs less prospect of U.S. help and more acceptance that its geography demands a settlement that accommodates Russia. The United States should stop discouraging that outcome.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What’s behind Trump’s Ukraine weapons U-Turn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

The case for cutting off weapons to Ukraine

By Dan Caldwell

July 6, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Pentagon pauses some weapons for Ukraine, experts weigh in on U.S. priorities

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

MAGA faithful cheer Trump for pausing Ukraine weapons after bristling at Iran strikes

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

More European defense spending isn’t cause for celebration

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 2, 2025

Events on Ukraine

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved