Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iraq / Maximum pressure and maximum vulnerability for U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria courts war
Iraq, Middle East

January 27, 2020

Maximum pressure and maximum vulnerability for U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria courts war

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 27, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Sunday, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad sustained rocket attacks for the second time in a week. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Sunday’s rocket attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad is just the latest example of why U.S. forces should leave Iraq. A vicious cocktail of bad policies—maximum pressure on Iran, ignoring the wishes of large numbers of Iraqis, reckless use of U.S. forces—has maximized danger in Iraq.

”Leaving behind relatively small numbers of U.S. soldiers to help Iraqis fight ISIS’s remnants is foolish. Failure to withdraw may now do as much to spark renewed jihadi resistance as to suffocate it. And U.S. forces cannot combat the punitive Iraqi policies and misgovernment that might cause a resurgence of Sunni extremism, whether or not it is called ISIS.

”The minuscule benefits of keeping troops in Iraq does not remotely justify leaving them there to be targeted by militias and possibly spark war with Iran.

”The U.S. promise to blame Iran for militia attacks in Iraq is dangerous. Iran’s support for militias is unquestionable, but its control of them is less certain. There are compelling reasons to suspect the well-armed Shiite militias in Iraq want revenge, regardless of Tehran’s wishes. The U.S. airstrike that killed Soleimani also killed the deputy head of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces. Washington’s refusal to even discuss the Iraqi government’s calls for U.S. forces to leave their country angers a broad swath of Iraqis, even some relatively friendly to the United States.

”Under these circumstances, U.S. military and civilian personnel in Iraq will remain targets. That risk, combined with the risk that retaliation could spark a war with Iran, far exceeds any potential benefit from the U.S. troop presence.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Why the Israel-Iran ceasefire feels like a strategic failure

By Alexander Langlois

July 8, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Don’t bet on a Gaza ceasefire

July 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

What comes next in the Israeli-Iranian conflict?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 30, 2025

Events on Iraq

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved