Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Full military withdrawal from Afghanistan is in the national interest
Afghanistan, Middle East

April 14, 2021

Full military withdrawal from Afghanistan is in the national interest

By Benjamin Friedman, Daniel Davis, and Gil Barndollar

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 14, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden announced all U.S. combat troops will be withdrawn from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021. Defense Priorities experts issued the following statements in response:

Benjamin H. Friedman, Policy Director, Defense Priorities:

“The situation in Afghanistan in September will be the same as it would be if U.S. troops stayed for another year, five years, or a decade. The Afghan government depends on American tax dollars, cannot arrest Taliban gains, let alone defeat it, and thus cannot make it capitulate in peace talks. It’s past time to stop throwing good money and lives after bad aims.”

Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret., Senior Fellow, Defense Priorities:

“At the time of the February 2020 agreement expressly calling for a full withdrawal by May, the U.S. had approximately 13,000 troops on the ground in Afghanistan. Trump withdrew over 10,000 of them before he left office, so the remaining load to withdraw is limited. Closing down a military installation is never easy, but there is no question the U.S. military can successfully withdraw all troops and close down or hand over all remaining facilities between now and September 11.”

Gil Barndollar, Senior Fellow, Defense Priorities:

“President Biden should be applauded for finally breaking with the ‘conditions-based’ language that promised an endless American commitment to the war in Afghanistan. Of course, Afghanistan’s civil war will continue. The important question is how that affects vital U.S. national interests in the country, of which there is really only one: preventing Afghanistan from becoming a staging ground for transnational terrorist attacks on the United States.”

Authors

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Afghanistan

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Afghanistan, Grand strategy, Syria

Trump can transform Middle East policy

By Daniel DePetris

February 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, China, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Taiwan, Ukraine‑Russia

Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion

By Christopher McCallion

January 13, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, Americas, Europe and Eurasia, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Biden exits, he grapples with his foreign policy legacy

By Daniel DePetris

January 9, 2025

op-edSyria, Afghanistan, Middle East, Russia

Who lost more weapons—Russia in Syria or America in Afghanistan?

By Gil Barndollar

December 17, 2024

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved