Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Expanding NATO to Finland and Sweden is gambling with U.S. and European security
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

May 12, 2022

Expanding NATO to Finland and Sweden is gambling with U.S. and European security

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 12, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Finland announced that the country will apply for NATO membership. Sweden is expected to make a similar announcement soon. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The United States should carefully debate NATO expansion to Finland and Sweden, not proceed swiftly in a knee-jerk attempt to punish Russia. At stake is adding two more states Americans might fight a war for—or use nuclear weapons to defend. Neither states’ membership adds to the security of the United States. So U.S. support should probably be withheld, especially for Finland, at least absent assurances from European states that they will take the lead in defending these Nordic countries if necessary, rather than relying, as usual, on U.S. efforts.

“The question of Finland and Sweden joining NATO is, if anything, less urgent today because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The war has eroded Russia’s conventional power and demonstrates its capability is not what was once feared.

“It is true each state has a capable military, including a useful navy. Their accession might be helpful in defending the Baltics, but capability is also a reason why these states don’t need NATO. The two states have collectively only about 45,000 active duty forces; too few to add much for alliance defense. Finland’s large reserve isn’t much use unless someone invades Finland.

“The case of making Finland a NATO member is especially troubled. Finland has long been a model of neutrality, which has worked rather well for it. Because it shares an 830-mile border with Russia, joining NATO might invite further antagonization from Moscow. If Finland does join, Europeans, not Americans, should commit troops to Finland’s border, as the U.S. does too much for European defense already and has less at stake in Scandinavia.

“Sympathetic feeling toward states is not a reason to threaten to kill large numbers of people on their behalf. The U.S. should maintain productive relations with Finland and Sweden, and it need not threaten war for them to serve our interests. They will be fine without becoming American protectorates.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on NATO

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Trump’s European nuclear weapons plan risks backfiring

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2026

Q&AEurope and Eurasia, Alliances, Basing and force posture, NATO

Why Washington needs to withdraw from Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

June 4, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

May 29, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Trump’s Germany Drawdown is Overdue

By Violet Collins

May 28, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia

U.S. to pull jets, destroyers and submarines from NATO as part of European drawdown

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 26, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.