Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / Do not guarantee Saudi Arabia’s security
Middle East

August 9, 2023

Do not guarantee Saudi Arabia’s security

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 9, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Reports today indicate the U.S. and Saudi Arabia have agreed to a framework to normalize Saudi relations with Israel, though Riyadh is asking Washington to provide the kingdom with security guarantees as part of a potential deal. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Giving Saudi Arabia a security guarantee, whether it is ‘ironclad’ as Riyadh reportedly requested or something less, would be a disastrous mistake. The United States should not be on the hook for the defense of Saudi Arabia. That would undermine U.S. security for no obvious purpose.

“One reason to not offer Saudi Arabia security guarantees is that it could be quite costly for Americans, involving heightened risk of war with Iran and others and potentially increased troop deployments, for no benefit. There is nothing that serves the U.S. interests in this proposed bargain.

“A second reason to oppose this proposal is that guaranteeing Saudi security would enable its recklessness. Late last decade, the Saudis seemed to think they had an unofficial U.S. security guarantee. That enabled aggression against civilians in Yemen, the Qatar blockade, belligerence against Iran, and insouciance when Jamal Khashoggi’s murder was revealed to be a Saudi state act.

“Third, the odds of this deal actually achieving its purported goal of benefiting Palestinians—let alone leading to a state of Palestine—are remote. There is no detail on what the Saudis actually offer on this front. And once the U.S. guarantees their security, the Saudis will have little reason to do much to fulfill their pledge. U.S. security guarantees in practice have proven essentially irreversible.

“The United States should be militarily exiting the Middle East, not taking on new security dependents there. There is nothing to be gained and much that can be lost by trying to manage that region militarily, as the past several decades should have taught us.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Maximalism will doom diplomacy with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Middle East

As Donald Trump prepares for Middle East visit, his efforts there aren’t inspiring

By Daniel DePetris

May 6, 2025

Press ReleaseHouthis, Air power, Middle East, Military analysis, Yemen

Ending strikes on Yemen: Good news if it sticks

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 6, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump needs his team on the same Iran page

By Daniel DePetris

May 5, 2025

op-edYemen, Air power, Houthis, Iran, Middle East

In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an ‘airpower trap’ that has drawn past US presidents into costly wars

By William Walldorf

May 5, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved