Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Diplomacy / Diplomacy is the only realistic way to avoid a nuclear Iran
Diplomacy, Iran, Nuclear weapons

February 18, 2021

Diplomacy is the only realistic way to avoid a nuclear Iran

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 18, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the U.S. made a formal offer to restart nuclear talks with Iran. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“It’s good news the Biden administration offered to resume talks with Iran to re-enter the JCPOA. The deal, which successfully restricted Iran’s nuclear program, succeeded in its limited aim. Leaving it has allowed Iran to move closer to obtaining nuclear weapons, while giving a political boost to hardliners there and to their more aggressive policies. Maximum pressure failed.

“But the announcement of talks with Iran does not resolve the timing issue keeping both countries from moving back into compliance—the demand that the other go first. It’s actually unclear there is much to discuss—each side’s part is known: the U.S. drops the sanctions Trump reimposed and Iran complies with the deal’s restrictions. The U.S. shouldn’t let symbolic timing issues distract from promptly re-entering the deal.

“The deal is important less because of its overt non-proliferation aims than its overall effect on U.S.-Iran relations and foreign policy. It limits the risk of a pointless war and reduces the futile and counterproductive U.S. military role in the Middle East.

“Whatever happens with diplomacy, it’s important to remember the U.S. can afford to worry less about Iran. It is a mid-tier power that is incapable of becoming a regional hegemon—let alone directly threatening the U.S.—and neighboring powers are well-capable of balancing Iran. U.S. interests in the Middle East are limited and diminishing, and U.S. forces should adopt an offshore role there.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Diplomacy

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Diplomacy, Iran, Middle East

Why U.S. Military Pressure on Iran Isn’t Working

By Alexander Langlois

April 30, 2026

Q&AChina, Asia, Diplomacy, Iran

Beijing’s balancing act in the Iran war

By Lyle Goldstein

March 19, 2026

Q&AUS‑Israel‑Iran, Diplomacy, Iran, Middle East

U.S.-Iran talks: Nuclear deal or no deal?

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 26, 2026

In the mediaIran, Diplomacy, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

‘Crisis of his own making’: Donald Trump weighs another war with Iran

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

February 23, 2026

ExplainerUS‑Israel‑Iran, Diplomacy, Iran, Middle East

Why Iran talks should deal only with nuclear issues

By Rosemary Kelanic

February 23, 2026

In the mediaIran, Diplomacy, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump talks peace in the Middle East as he readies war on Iran

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

February 20, 2026

Events on Diplomacy

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.