Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Debate should explore foreign policy differences
Grand strategy, China

October 22, 2020

Debate should explore foreign policy differences

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 22, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Tonight, President Trump and Vice President Biden, who will debate for the last time before Election Day, are set to face questions on national security. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement:

“Nearly four years into Donald Trump’s presidency and nearly two into Joe Biden’s campaign for the job, we know oddly little about how their foreign policies will differ. If substance can seep through the rancor tonight, there’s plenty we can still learn.

“For example, both candidates say they’ll end U.S. wars. This rhetoric is welcome, but will it translate into reality? Trump hasn’t managed to end any wars, though he has made slow progress on Afghanistan. Biden says he’ll end wars while leaving counterterrorism forces there, which seems contradictory.

“We hear constant debate about China’s various sins, real and imagined, against global health and stability but little about what either candidate would do to alter the U.S. defense posture in East Asia.

“Biden criticizes Trump’s handling of allies, but there’s been little detail about what he would do differently. After all, Trump hasn’t actually jettisoned any alliance that Biden can thus restore.

“Then there is the $750 billion question of the defense budget. Might either candidate consider restraining our overly ambitious foreign policy to trim it, address our $27 trillion national debt, and focus on responding to the pandemic? Do we need to spend so much to be safe?

“These are just some of the questions Americans should have answered to inform their decisions and hold the winner accountable.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Grand strategy

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edGrand strategy

Whatever happened to ‘America first?’

By Adam Gallagher

February 4, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Greenland, NATO, Western Hemisphere

Donald Trump is endangering U.S. alliances

By Christopher McCallion

January 30, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, Diplomacy

The end of ‘Pax Americana’ and start of a ‘post-American’ era doesn’t necessarily mean the world will be less safe

By Peter Harris

January 28, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Greenland, Western Hemisphere

Trump’s ‘Donroe Doctrine’ flaunts U.S. expansionism and intervention. But will it pay off long-term?

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 25, 2026

ExplainerWestern Hemisphere, Grand strategy

Move on from Washington’s outdated Cuba policy

By Daniel DePetris

January 23, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved