Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Debate should explore foreign policy differences
Grand strategy, China

October 22, 2020

Debate should explore foreign policy differences

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 22, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Tonight, President Trump and Vice President Biden, who will debate for the last time before Election Day, are set to face questions on national security. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement:

“Nearly four years into Donald Trump’s presidency and nearly two into Joe Biden’s campaign for the job, we know oddly little about how their foreign policies will differ. If substance can seep through the rancor tonight, there’s plenty we can still learn.

“For example, both candidates say they’ll end U.S. wars. This rhetoric is welcome, but will it translate into reality? Trump hasn’t managed to end any wars, though he has made slow progress on Afghanistan. Biden says he’ll end wars while leaving counterterrorism forces there, which seems contradictory.

“We hear constant debate about China’s various sins, real and imagined, against global health and stability but little about what either candidate would do to alter the U.S. defense posture in East Asia.

“Biden criticizes Trump’s handling of allies, but there’s been little detail about what he would do differently. After all, Trump hasn’t actually jettisoned any alliance that Biden can thus restore.

“Then there is the $750 billion question of the defense budget. Might either candidate consider restraining our overly ambitious foreign policy to trim it, address our $27 trillion national debt, and focus on responding to the pandemic? Do we need to spend so much to be safe?

“These are just some of the questions Americans should have answered to inform their decisions and hold the winner accountable.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

In the mediaMilitary analysis, Asia, Naval power

Jennifer Kavanagh on BBC News: Review of AUKUS pact is warranted

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 11, 2025

op-edAsia

US-Korea alliance to change under Lee Jae-myung

By Daniel DePetris

June 10, 2025

op-edAsia

The US-ROK alliance will change under Lee Jae-myung

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Taiwan

How big of a threat is China really?

By Daniel DePetris

June 3, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved