Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / China’s buildup would not meaningfully alter the nuclear balance
China, Nuclear weapons, Taiwan

November 3, 2021

China’s buildup would not meaningfully alter the nuclear balance

By Lyle Goldstein

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 3, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Pentagon released a report assessing that China is increasing its nuclear arsenal faster than was previously thought. Defense Priorities Director of Asia Engagement Lyle Goldstein issued the following statement in response:

“DoD’s announcement corroborates reports from the summer that suggest a moderate buildup of Chinese strategic nuclear forces is now underway. This is not a crash buildup, but rather a deliberate attempt to ensure Washington knows China has sufficiently robust nuclear forces to ensure a balance of power with the U.S. and maintain deterrence. Such a buildup will not change the nuclear balance since China and the U.S. will remain in a situation of mutually assured destruction, or MAD. China’s buildup will simply guarantee the ‘rubble will bounce’—adding another layer of certainty to MAD, because the U.S., while possessing numerical superiority, still has no hope of intercepting most Chinese missiles in war.

“Instead of mutually antagonistic policies, which one might characterize as a ‘new cold war,’ the proper response should be to avoid an over-reaction and instead seek to deescalate, reestablish dialogue, adopt a more defensive posture, and implement crisis management steps, especially with respect to the volatile Taiwan situation.”

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edAsia, Burden sharing, China, Naval power, Taiwan

AUKUS is a flawed but sensible way to burden-share in the Pacific

By Lyle Goldstein

July 14, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved