Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Biden’s commitment to exit Afghanistan by 9/11 is welcome—and overdue
Afghanistan, Middle East

April 13, 2021

Biden’s commitment to exit Afghanistan by 9/11 is welcome—and overdue

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 13, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The Washington Post reported that President Biden will withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis issued the following statement in response:

“The Biden administration’s decision to announce a full and complete U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021 is good news. The withdrawal is a logical, realistic acknowledgment that the U.S. has achieved all it can in this 20-year war. While it’s disappointing that U.S. forces will remain in Afghanistan after May 1, setting a concrete date for withdrawal is a strong indication that the U.S. is intent on leaving.

“The U.S. went into Afghanistan for two specific reasons: 1) annihilate Al-Qaeda and 2) punish the Taliban for harboring the group. The U.S. and its allies accomplished these goals in the war’s first year. The change of mission to counterinsurgency and nation-building proved to be a significant mistake with high costs in blood and treasure, binding two generations of U.S. servicemembers to an unwinnable civil war. By ending the U.S. military role in Afghanistan, President Biden deserves credit for accepting reality: the U.S. need not commit itself to a perpetual war in order to protect its security interests.

“The American people have long been opposed to continued U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan. For years, polls have consistently demonstrated the public’s disillusionment about the conflict. Many have rightly questioned whether molding Afghanistan into a pro-Western democracy was possible or even necessary.

“Breaking the May 1 deadline in the withdrawal agreement negotiated by the the Trump administration is risky. The Taliban may withhold their compliance with the deal, including their agreement not to attack US forces. Regardless, nothing should be allowed to again delay U.S. exit.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Afghanistan

In the mediaAfghanistan, Middle East

Donald Trump Wants U.S. Military Base Back in Afghanistan

Featuring Daniel DePetris

September 18, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Afghanistan, Grand strategy, Syria

Trump can transform Middle East policy

By Daniel DePetris

February 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, China, China‑Taiwan, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Taiwan, Ukraine‑Russia

Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion

By Christopher McCallion

January 13, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, Americas, Europe and Eurasia, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Biden exits, he grapples with his foreign policy legacy

By Daniel DePetris

January 9, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved