Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / After Iran’s symbolic response, the U.S. should de-escalate to avoid all-out war
Iran

January 8, 2020

After Iran’s symbolic response, the U.S. should de-escalate to avoid all-out war

By Gil Barndollar

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 8, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Trump addressed the nation regarding Iran’s missile attacks on U.S. targets, which fortunately killed no Americans. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Gil Barndollar issued the following statement in response:

“The U.S. and Iran now stand on the cusp of full-blown war. Last night’s retaliatory strike by Iran, however, was clearly a symbolic, face-saving measure. Striking just two bases in Iraq in the dead of night with a tiny fraction of their missile arsenal, Iran reportedly killed no Americans or Iraqis—and probably did not intend to.

“Iran’s carefully calibrated response shows it is trying to escape from this situation. President Trump today indicated he, too, would like to avoid all-out war, but ‘maximum pressure’ is an escalation strategy that courts war. Continuing maximum pressure while claiming you don’t want war with Iran is like playing Russian roulette and claiming you don’t want to commit suicide.

“A war in the Persian Gulf would be ruinous for all nations involved—most of which would be U.S. partners—and would weaken the United States. The way out is clear. The U.S. should de-escalate by abandoning maximum pressure and seeking talks with Iran. The ball is in our court.”

Author

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Middle East, Sanctions

Trump’s unconventional Syria trip marks a paradigm shift

By Daniel DePetris

May 16, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Trump has tired of Netanyahu

By Rajan Menon and Daniel DePetris

May 14, 2025

Press ReleaseSyria, Basing and force posture, Middle East

In Syria, pair sanctions relief with a troop withdrawal

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 14, 2025

op-edMiddle East, China, Iran, Syria

Backgrounder: U.S. interests in the Middle East and President Trump’s visit

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 13, 2025

op-edYemen, Houthis, Middle East

The Houthi problem won’t be solved until Israel agrees to a renewed ceasefire

By Kevin Joseph

May 12, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Trump risks boxing himself in on Iran

By Michael Hall

May 12, 2025

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualGrand strategy, Iran, Middle East, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved