Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Afghanistan, Iraq drawdowns are welcome, overdue, and insufficient
Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East

September 9, 2020

Afghanistan, Iraq drawdowns are welcome, overdue, and insufficient

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 9, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Politico reported CENTCOM will be reducing the number of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan over the coming months. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The troop reductions in Afghanistan and Iraq announced today are tardy and insufficient but good news.

“In Afghanistan we are now nearly 19 years into a war that long ago achieved its primary counterterrorism aims, and has since failed to achieve its grandiose counterinsurgency objectives. It should be obvious by now that the war, far from advancing U.S. security, afflicts it. Experience shows that U.S. counterterrorism goals can be met without large, permanent ground forces there. This withdrawal should be a step towards the swift removal of remaining U.S. ground forces.

“In Iraq, the purpose of U.S. forces has been unclear since the destruction of ISIS’s caliphate. They have reliably come under rocket fire that threatens to escalate into a larger war with Shi’ite militias or Iran, which we officially blame for militia activity. U.S. troops are not preventing a renewal of ISIS by continuing to occupy Iraq, indeed they may be fanning the sectarian grievances that keep up support for the Sunni extremism underlying it.

“Even if this push to wind down overly ambitious, unnecessary wars is an effort to win votes in November, then we should be grateful to live in a democracy still functional enough to operate based on the interests and wishes of the American people.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Afghanistan

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Afghanistan, Grand strategy, Syria

Trump can transform Middle East policy

By Daniel DePetris

February 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, China, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Taiwan, Ukraine‑Russia

Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion

By Christopher McCallion

January 13, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, Americas, Europe and Eurasia, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Biden exits, he grapples with his foreign policy legacy

By Daniel DePetris

January 9, 2025

op-edSyria, Afghanistan, Middle East, Russia

Who lost more weapons—Russia in Syria or America in Afghanistan?

By Gil Barndollar

December 17, 2024

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved