Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Afghan draw down announcement is encouraging, but more is needed
Afghanistan, Counterterrorism

August 1, 2019

Afghan draw down announcement is encouraging, but more is needed

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 1, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Thursday, a U.S.-Taliban deal was announced that included a draw down of the 14,000 U.S. forces currently in Afghanistan. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“A deal to reduce U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan by 5,000 to 6,000 in exchange for the Taliban’s renunciation of Al-Qaeda, a cease-fire, and an agreement to begin direct talks with the Afghan government is good news, provided it leads to a full U.S. military withdrawal in the next year.

“This deal would only take U.S. troop levels back to about where they were when President Trump took office. That’s not enough. After nearly 18 years of failed efforts to build the Afghan state by defeating its enemies, more than $1 trillion in spending, and more than 2,400 U.S. servicemembers killed, it is time to fully end the war. Negotiations with the Taliban can be useful, but the United States shouldn’t wait on them to leave Afghanistan.

“The deal, as reported, would entail meaningful Taliban concessions, especially on the ceasefire. Their willingness to officially disown Al-Qaeda is also useful as symbolism, even though their fear of being attacked again by the United States is stronger than any declarations.

“The danger of the deal is it could preserve, rather than end, the U.S. war. The Taliban leadership may lack the power to enforce a ceasefire on all their commanders. They may renege on some promises. Peace talks with the Afghan government will be difficult in the best circumstance. Some in Washington may then seek to stall progress toward a complete U.S. military withdrawal. That would be a mistake.

“The United States protects itself from terrorism through its ability to track and attack threats directly via missiles and raids, through willingness to use that capability, and its ability to deter groups like the Taliban from harboring anti-American terrorists. Those factors will operate to protect Americans with or without a deal with the Taliban and in the absence of U.S. combat forces.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edAsia

The Trump administration cools off India-Pakistan conflict — for now

By Daniel DePetris

May 13, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power, Taiwan

China tariffs deal could backfire on Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2025

op-edAsia, Air power, Nuclear weapons

Will India or Pakistan resort to the nuclear option?

By Rajan Menon

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

Trump fires national security adviser, signaling new China line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 2, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved