Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iraq / A withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq is overdue
Iraq, Middle East

April 7, 2021

A withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq is overdue

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 7, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—In a strategic dialogue with Iraq held earlier today, the U.S. indicated its combat forces will exit Iraq, with the timing and details to be worked out in future discussions. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The significance of the State Department’s mention of a potential ‘redeployment of combat forces’ away from Iraq is uncertain. Regardless, such a deployment is overdue. And U.S. forces devoted to training and advisory roles, rather than combat, should come home too. U.S. forces have been training and advising Iraq for more than a decade and a half now. If they aren’t able to take on ISIS’s remnants themselves, they will never be, and the training mission is futile.

“U.S. troops in Iraq regularly take rocket fire from Shi’ite militias, for no good reason. Those attacks invite retaliation, creating a risk of wider war pitting U.S. forces against Shi’ite extremists. Given the militias’ ties to Iran, U.S. forces in Iraq are also a potential pathway to a war with Tehran. The U.S. contingent in Iraq is more likely to fuel the extremism that might power a resurgence of ISIS or a group like it than to suppress it.

“After 18 years (or 30 if you go back to the Gulf War) it’s past time for the U.S. war in Iraq to finally end.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Why the Israel-Iran ceasefire feels like a strategic failure

By Alexander Langlois

July 8, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Don’t bet on a Gaza ceasefire

July 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

What comes next in the Israeli-Iranian conflict?

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 30, 2025

Events on Iraq

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved