Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Will the Kursk raid backfire on Ukraine?
Ukraine‑Russia, Russia, Ukraine

August 19, 2024

Will the Kursk raid backfire on Ukraine?

By Benjamin Friedman and Christopher McCallion

Over the past week, Ukrainian forces have established a 1,000-square-kilometre bulge in Russia’s Kursk region. An additional thrust to the south, in the Belgorod region, is also underway. Ukraine‘s foreign ministry says it aims to create a buffer zone to prevent missile attacks, but other objectives seem paramount: to draw Russian forces from the front lines, seize a bargaining chip for future negotiations, embarrass the Kremlin, and boost Ukrainian morale while heartening its Western backers.

The Kursk attacks are more akin to border raids than a genuine offensive campaign. As with Ukrainian missile attacks on Russian naval forces in the Black Sea or targets inside Russia, the raid serves to harass Russian forces and distract them from their main objective. But it cannot substitute for the combat power needed to exploit a breakthrough in Russia’s front lines—combat power that Kyiv does not possess and seems unable to generate.

So far, Russia does not seem to have drawn significant forces from the front lines, though the army has reportedly moved some. Russian commanders may prefer to keep up pressure there and let reserve forces labour to reverse the incursion, expecting that logistical burdens will make it harder to maintain. What’s more, with Russia concentrating airpower on stopping Ukraine’s forces, and the heavier losses troops on offensive tend to suffer versus defenders, Ukraine may be sacrificing manpower it increasingly needs for defence. But it’s also worth noting that as Ukraine grabs territory in Russia, Russia is making steady and more consequential progress inside Ukraine.

Read at UnHerd

Authors

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

Photo of Chris McCallion

Christopher
McCallion

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

No cause for alarm: The case for a measured response to Russian air incursions

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 20, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

U.S. Tomahawk refusal protects Ukraine from false hope

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 19, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Putin was never going to bend to Trump so easily

By Daniel DePetris

October 16, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

President Donald Trump’s Ukraine pivot is an opportunity for Europe to step up

By Christopher McCallion

October 16, 2025

Ukraine‑Russia, Air power, Military analysis

After strong-arming a ceasefire in Gaza, Trump tries to do it again in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 16, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis

Yes, Trump can end the Russia–Ukraine war

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 14, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved