Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / Will Iran’s foreign policy change after Raisi’s death?
Iran

May 20, 2024

Will Iran’s foreign policy change after Raisi’s death?

By Daniel DePetris

Ebrahim Raisi, the hardliner jurist-turned-president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, died in a plane crash over the weekend after coming back from a ceremony marking a new joint dam project with Azerbaijan. Iranian foreign minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, who was also on board, perished in the crash as well.

Internally, Raisi’s death won’t make much of a dent. The Iranian political establishment will shed a few tears and then move on. Per the Iranian constitution, elections will have to be organized in fifty days to find a replacement. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Guardian Council, the body responsible for vetting candidates, will clear the decks for another hardliner, just as they did for Raisi three years ago. The one winner out of this situation: Mojtaba Khamenei, the supreme leader’s son, who is rumored to be in the running to succeed the older Khamenei once he dies. The other potential candidate was none other than Raisi.

US policymakers across the national security establishment will be assessing what Raisi’s death means in the grand scheme of things. You can bet that country analysts in the Central Intelligence Agency’s Near East Division have already done various analyses probing different contingencies in the event of a high-profile Iranian death.

The optimal question is fairly obvious: how will Iran’s foreign policy change after Raisi’s demise? The answer is just as obvious: it won’t. There is no Iranian version of Mikhail Gorbachev set to rise to the office and transform Iran from a US adversary to a sometimes-partner. The hardliners control the levers of power, and whatever moderates exist today have seen their influence gutted by Khamenei’s office, the Guardian Council, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

 

Read at The Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Maximalism will doom diplomacy with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Middle East

As Donald Trump prepares for Middle East visit, his efforts there aren’t inspiring

By Daniel DePetris

May 6, 2025

Press ReleaseHouthis, Air power, Middle East, Military analysis, Yemen

Ending strikes on Yemen: Good news if it sticks

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 6, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump needs his team on the same Iran page

By Daniel DePetris

May 5, 2025

op-edYemen, Air power, Houthis, Iran, Middle East

In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an ‘airpower trap’ that has drawn past US presidents into costly wars

By William Walldorf

May 5, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualGrand strategy, Iran, Middle East, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024
in-personGrand strategy, Iran, North Korea, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Managing nuclear proliferation crises

October 30, 2017

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved